Thanks to all who answered. The answers are very clear, but the original
message and the adoption page are in my opinion much less clear. I can
however live with it :-)
Best regards
Janusz
On Wed, Feb 28 2018 at 11:53 +0100, mark_at_macchiato.com writes:
> Also, please click through from the announcement to http://www.unicode.org/consortium/adopt-a-character.html.
>
> If it isn't apparent from that page what the relationship is, we have some work to do...
>
> Mark
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Martin J. Dürst via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> On 2018/02/28 19:38, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27 2018 at 13:45 -0800, announcements_at_unicode.org writes:
>
> The 157 new Emoji are now available for adoption, to help the Unicode
> Consortium’s work on digitally disadvantaged languages.
>
> I'm quite curious what it the relation between the new emojis and the
> digitally disadvantages languages. I see none.
>
> I think this was mentioned before on this list, in particular by Mark:
> The money collected from character adoptions (where emoji are a prominent target) is (mostly?) used to support work on not-yet-encoded (thus digitally
> disadvantaged) scripts. See e.g. the recent announcement at http://blog.unicode.org/2018/02/adopt-character-grant-to-support-three.html.
-- , Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej) Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department) jsbien@uw.edu.pl, jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/Received on Wed Feb 28 2018 - 05:22:38 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 28 2018 - 05:22:38 CST