Tim Partridge wrote:
> Perhaps the CLDR work the Consortium does is being referenced. That is
> by language on this list
> http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/32/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#ee
> By the time it gets to the 100th entry the Modern percentage has "room
> for improvement".
I think that is a measurement of locale coverage -- whether the
collation tables and translations of "a.m." and "p.m." and "a week ago
Thursday" are correct and verified -- not character coverage.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.orgReceived on Thu Mar 01 2018 - 14:11:15 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 01 2018 - 14:11:15 CST