Whew! Thanks for explaining the joke! Everyone here really thought they
were serious. Maybe you should write to the authors of the RFC and
explain to them that their growth-function is incorrect. I'm sure
they'd be glad of the correction.
~mark
On 04/02/2018 09:49 PM, Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> It's fun to consider the introdroduction (after emojis) of imojis,
> amojis, umojis and omojis for individual people (or named pets), alien
> species (E.T. wants to be able to call home with his own language and
> script !), unknown things, and obfuscated entities. Also fun for new
> "trollface" characters. In fact you could represent every individual
> or even single atom in the universe that has ever created since the
> BingBang !
>
> But unlike peoples and social entities, characters to encode don't
> grow exponentially but still linearily at a slowing speed. ....
Received on Mon Apr 02 2018 - 20:57:15 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 02 2018 - 20:57:15 CDT