The UTC didn't want to burden the doc registry with all the emoji proposals.
Mark
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Asmus Freytag via Unicode <
unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> On 4/19/2018 5:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode wrote:
>
> > imagine I discover that someone has already proposed the emoji that I
> am interested in
>
> In some cases we've have contacted people to see if they want to engage
> with other proposers. But to handle larger numbers we'd need a simple,
> light-weight way to let people know, while maintaining people's privacy
> when they want it.
>
>
> I would tend to think that actual proposals are a matter of public record.
> Emoji should not be handled differently than other proposals for character
> encoding in that regard.
>
> Why should there be an assumption that these are "proposals in private" in
> this case?
>
> A./
>
Received on Thu Apr 19 2018 - 11:42:33 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 19 2018 - 11:42:33 CDT