Re: Can NFKC turn valid UAX 31 identifiers into non-identifiers?

From: Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 18:56:37 -0700
On 6/6/2018 2:25 PM, Hans Åberg via Unicode wrote:

      

        
On 4 Jun 2018, at 21:49, Manish Goregaokar via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:

The Rust community is considering adding non-ascii identifiers, which follow UAX #31 (XID_Start XID_Continue*, with tweaks). The proposal also asks for identifiers to be treated as equivalent under NFKC.


      

      
So, in this language, if one defines a projection function 𝜋 and the usual constant π, what is 𝜋(π) supposed to mean? - Just curious.






    

    
In a language where one writes ASCII "pi"
        instead, what is pi(pi) supposed to mean?

    
A./

    

  

Received on Wed Jun 06 2018 - 20:56:49 CDT














This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 
: Wed Jun 06 2018 - 20:56:50 CDT