Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:45:42 +0100

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:43:36 +0000 (UTC)
philip chastney via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 17/7/18, Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to
> > bidi plaintext To: unicode_at_unicode.org
> > Date: Tuesday, 17 July, 2018, 3:30 AM
>
> > An interesting ambiguity is "!True" v. "True!". 
> > "!True" can be read as "Not true".
>
> true - there are contexts where "!True" can be read as "Not true".

The context I had in mind was terse exchanges between those who have
recently programmed in C. Thus, 'true' would be read as 'true' rather
than as '1', and '!true' as 'not true'.

A longer context would usually eliminate the ambiguity.

Richard.
Received on Wed Jul 18 2018 - 13:45:59 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 18 2018 - 13:46:00 CDT