On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Michael Everson via Unicode <
unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> No, James is mistaken. Georgian is structurally casing, and *the
> difference is not stylistic, but orthographic*.
Other people made the argument you are making, Alex. My Georgian colleagues
> and I made the better, more accurate argument.
Michael, can you please provide an example for the modern Georgian? It is
in present continuous tense, so, samples from 19th century are not valid.
(They are probably also not valid formally, but I have to check those books
first.)
Sincerely,
Alex.
Received on Fri Jul 27 2018 - 07:42:21 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 27 2018 - 07:42:21 CDT