Re: Private Use areas

From: Ken Whistler via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:17:21 -0700

On 8/20/2018 5:04 PM, Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode wrote:
> Is there a block of RTL PUA also?

No.

--Ken
Received on Mon Aug 20 2018 - 19:17:44 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas (was: Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was ...))"
Previous message: Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas (was: Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was ...))"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas (was: Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was ...))"
Next in thread: Adam Borowski via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Reply: Adam Borowski via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Reply: Steven R. Loomis via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: William_J_G Overington via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: William_J_G Overington via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: William_J_G Overington via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"
Maybe reply: Marcel Schneider via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 20 2018 - 19:17:44 CDT