On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:53 PM, James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org
> wrote:
> Blissymbolics, as pointed out
> by Leo Broukhis, might be good candidates for "emojification".
>
Why don't we just get Blissymbolics encoded as it is?
Received on Mon Aug 20 2018 - 22:21:17 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 20 2018 - 22:21:17 CDT