Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magister"

On Thu, Nov 01 2018 at 13:34 -0700, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote:
> On 11/1/2018 10:23 AM, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode wrote:

[...]

> Looks like you completely missed my point. Nobody ever claimed that
> reproducing all variations in manuscripts is in scope of Unicode, so
> whom do you want to convince that it is not?
>
> Looks like you are missing my point about there being a continuum with
> not clear lines that can be perfectly drawn a-priori.

Why do you think so? There is nothing in my posts which can be used to
support your claim. Perhaps you confused me with some other poster?

Best regards

Janusz

-- 
             ,   
Janusz S. Bien
emeryt (emeritus)
https://sites.google.com/view/jsbien