Re: Excessive emoji usage and TTS (was Re: A last missing link)

From: Khaled Hosny via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:41:29 +0200

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:54:59PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> On Thu 10 Jan, 2019, 20:49 Arthur Reutenauer via Unicode <
> unicode_at_unicode.org wrote:
>
> >
> > On this topic, I was just pointed to
> >
> > https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/1083073242330361856
> >
> > โ€œYou ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ it's ๐’ธ๐“Š๐“‰โ„ฏ to ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ your tweets and usernames
> > ๐–™๐–๐–Ž๐–˜ ๐–œ๐–†๐–ž. But
> > have you ๐™ก๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™š๐™™ to what it ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ with assistive
> > technologies
> > like ๐“ฅ๐“ธ๐“ฒ๐“ฌ๐“ฎ๐“ž๐“ฟ๐“ฎ๐“ป?โ€
>
>
> Something similar:
>
> https://twitter.com/aaronreynolds/status/1083098920132071424?s=20
>
> "This is what itโ€™s like to get texts from my fourteen year old while
> driving."
>
> https://t.co/s8949bmgZI

That is pretty good actually and even a positive point for emoji (if
these were mere images you would get nothing out of it without extra
tagging, and it would still lack the standardization). Nothing like what
one gets from the math symbols abuse.

Regards,
Khaled
Received on Thu Jan 10 2019 - 10:41:51 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 10 2019 - 10:41:51 CST