Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

From: Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:02:05 -0800
On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100
Hans Γ…berg via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:


On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode
<unicode@unicode.org> wrote:

Hans Γ…berg wrote,
  

How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘ π‘’Μ  

Thought about using a combining accent.  Figured it would just
display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first.  It
actually renders perfectly here.  /That's/ good to know.  (smile)  

It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑑)
is 𝛾̇(𝑑).

No it isn't.  You should be using a spacing character for
differentiation.

Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot above is definitely common usage in physics.

A./


 On the other hand, one uses a combining circumflex
for Fourier transforms.

Richard.


Received on Mon Jan 14 2019 - 18:02:17 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 14 2019 - 18:02:17 CST