Re: Proposal for BiDi in terminal emulators

From: Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:31:43 -0700

Egmont Koblinger wrote:
 
> "Basic Arabic shaping, at the level of a typewriter, is
> straightforward enough to be implemented in the application, using
> presentation form characters, as I suggest". Could you please point
> out the problems with this statement?
 
As multiple people have pointed out, Arabic presentation forms don't
cover the whole Arabic script and are not generally recommended for new
applications, though they are not formally deprecated.

If you take a look at the parallel discussion about italics in plain
text, you will see a corollary in the use of Mathematical Alphanumeric
Symbols: they look tempting and are (usually) easy to render, but among
other things, they only cover [A-Za-zıȷΑ-Ωα-ω] and thus miss much
of the text that may need to be italicized.
 
 

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
Received on Thu Jan 31 2019 - 11:32:32 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 31 2019 - 11:32:32 CST