On 2019-04-26 11:08 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
> This is a small percentage of the number of fonts that have all four of these Armenian glyphs, but show the abbreviation mark as a spacing glyph. It looks like Unicode is right, Wikipedia is right, and the fonts are wrong.
If the Wikipedia page(s) are correct, then Unicode isn't. Unicode
charts don't show the glyph on the dotted circle and the canonical
combining class is shown as "spacing". The fact that Doug Ewell found
some installed fonts displaying the character as a combining mark
suggests that the Wikipedia pages are correct. This character is listed
as being unused in modern Armenian, but you'd think that it would have
been exposed before now since the charcter has been in Unicode since
version 1.0.
Received on Fri Apr 26 2019 - 19:09:27 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 26 2019 - 19:09:28 CDT