Re: Unicode "no-op" Character?

From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:37:04 +0100

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 21:10:08 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> In fact, that might be the best description: It's not just an
> "ignorable", it's a "discardable". Unicode doesn't have that, does it?

No, though the byte order mark at the start of a file comes close.
Discardables are a security risk, as security filters may find it hard
to take them into account.

Richard.
Received on Sun Jun 23 2019 - 03:37:26 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 23 2019 - 03:37:26 CDT