Re: One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)

From: James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:09:49 +0000

On 2020-01-01 8:11 PM, James Kass wrote:
> It’s too bad that ISCII didn’t accomodate the needs of Vedic Sanskrit,
> but here we are.

Sorry, that might be wrong to say. It's possible that it's Unicode's
adaptation of ISCII that hinders Vedic Sanskrit.
Received on Wed Jan 01 2020 - 17:10:28 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)"
Previous message: James Kass via Unicode: "One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)"
Reply: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: One encoding per shape (was Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 01 2020 - 17:10:28 CST