Well, no, in this case "strange" means strange, as Ken Lunde notes. I'm
just pointing to his list, because it pulls together quite a few Han
characters that *also* have dubious cases for encoding.
Or you could turn the argument around, I suppose, and note that just
because the hieroglyph for "Egyptologist" is strange, that doesn't
necessarily mean that the case for encoding it is dubious. ;-)
--Ken
On 2/13/2020 3:47 PM, jk_at_koremail.com wrote:
> An interesting comparison, if strange means dubious, then the name
> kstrange should be changed or some of the content removed because many
> of the characters in the set are not dubious in the least.
>
Received on Thu Feb 13 2020 - 18:13:20 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 13 2020 - 18:13:20 CST