Re: Is the binaryness/textness of a data format a property?

From: Martin J. Dürst via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 01:43:50 +0000

On 20/03/2020 23:41, Adam Borowski via Unicode wrote:

> Also, UTF-8 can carry more than Unicode -- for example, U+D800..U+DFFF or
> U+11000..U+7FFFFFFF (or possibly even up to 2³⁶ or 2⁴²), which has its uses
> but is not well-formed Unicode.

This would definitely no longer be UTF-8! Martin.
Received on Fri Mar 20 2020 - 20:44:16 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Is the binaryness/textness of a data format a property?"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Is the binaryness/textness of a data format a property?"
In reply to: Adam Borowski via Unicode: "Re: Is the binaryness/textness of a data format a property?"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Is the binaryness/textness of a data format a property?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 20 2020 - 20:44:18 CDT