Yes, in view of the case, I would agree with this. It would solve some problems.
Emil Her^sak.
----------
From: Michael Everson[SMTP:everson@indigo.ie]
Reply To: unicode@unicode.org
Sent: 1997. studeni 30 06:09
To: Multiple Recipients of
Subject: Re: UK (Church Slavonic); and Glagolitic
Ar 11:09 -0800 1997-11-28, scríobh John Clews:
>
>Michael Everson also replied to Emil Hers^ak:
>
>> I would not fight strongly for a unification (which should come as no
>> surprise to readers of Unicode list). What do existing typefaces provide?
>> Are there any coded character sets with both?
>
>John Clews notes:
>
>That sounds like you are saying that we _should_ also consider
>dis-unification of Cyrillic and Church Slavonic. Is that what you
>mean?
No, it is not. I meant that I would be favourably disposed to encoding an
8-UK as distinct from the existing UK ligature, depending on the evidence.
-- Michael Everson, EGT * http://www.indigo.ie/egt 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland) Gutháin: +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:38 EDT