Den 2 Sep 98, klokka 1:31 skreiv Michael Everson i «Re: S with
comma/cedilla»:
> letter will do. But the canonical _character_, taught to children in
> schools, is a proper cedilla for Turkish etc. and a proper comma below for
> Romanian.
>
> The Latvian letters called "WITH CEDILLA" likewise should never ever be
> drawn with cedillas. This is another inherited error in the standard.
> Apparently, although the bad name encourages ignorant font producers to
> draw the wrong glyphs which aren't appropriate for Latvian, there aren't
> any other languages apart from Livonian which use these characters, so
> there isn't any conflict as there was between Romanian and Turkish.
>
It comes to my mind that there exists a romanisation/transliteration
standard for Arabic which uses a selection of consonants with cedilla
below...
Any references?
--
Herman Ranes Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag
Avdeling for teknologi
Telefon +47 73559606 Institutt for elektroteknikk
Telefaks +47 73559581
<herman@iet.hist.no> N-7005 Trondheim
http://www.hist.no/~herman/ NOREG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:41 EDT