Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Thu Jan 14 1999 - 13:59:07 EST

The ideographs FA0E, FA0F, FA11, FA13, FA14, FA1F, FA21, FA23, FA24,
FA27, FA28, and FA29 have no canonical equivalents. The Unicode
Standard just says they are "duplicates from various industry
standards", but if they are duplicates, what are they duplicates of?

Two of them (FA1F and FA23) were in the new Vertical Extension A
block, but were removed from that block because they were already
present in Unicode. 

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT