Re: New Unicode blurb

From: Robert A. Rosenberg (bob.rosenberg@digitscorp.com)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 14:44:50 EST

Next message: Reynolds, Gregg: "RE: 100+ACU- (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: 100%"
Maybe in reply to: Frank da Cruz: "New Unicode blurb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 01:13 PM 01/24/2000 -0800, Frank da Cruz wrote:
>When RFC2066 first appeared we wrote a detailed commentary on it which
>was ignored, as most comments on RFCs are.

By the time the RFC gets issued, TPTB consider it a closed issue. They say
you should have griped/commented while it was still in draft
form.

Next message: Reynolds, Gregg: "RE: 100+ACU- (was Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: 100%"
Maybe in reply to: Frank da Cruz: "New Unicode blurb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT