on 4/4/00 8:17 AM, Mark Davis at markdavis@ispchannel.com wrote:
> Both of these conversions were *extremely* painful, and took many
> person-months to do -- far more than we anticipated. Ideally, FrameMaker would
> move to supporting Unicode, and we wouldn't have to convert again, but I don't
> know what Adobe's plans are (anyone have an idea?).
>
The rumors I hear is that FrameMaker is not going to undergo any further
development, but that Adobe is planning to push InDesign as its replacement.
(InDesign is Unicode-based, at least.) Those are, however, just rumors. You
can pretty much bet your bottom dollar that Adobe isn't going to convert
Frame to use Unicode.
=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
tseng@blueneptune.com
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:00 EDT