on 4/8/00 10:34 AM, John Cowan at email@example.com wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org scripsit:
>> In Version 3 of the Standard, the 214 Kangxi classifiers
>> have been singled out and given their own new, code points in
>> addition to the ones they already had.
> That some of them already had, I think. Some radicals are not zi4.
All of them had them. Even though many of them aren't words -- that is,
couldn't be used in a sentence all by themselves -- they all got encoded
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:01 EDT