It would be much more reassuring if that principle where stated in the procedures. What *is* in the procedures talks about "deletions, and changes of codes". How do you reconcile this statement with what you say?
Michael Everson wrote:
> Ar 04:02 -0800 2000-04-25, scríobh Herman Ranes:
> >It may have been thoroughly discussed earlier in this list (any archive
> >links?), but I wonder:
> >why did ISO 639 change the codes 'in', 'iw' and 'ji' into 'id', 'he' and
> >'yi' in 1989?
> It doesn't matter. :-) These kinds of changes are not allowed any more.
> Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
> 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland
> Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
> 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT