I believe that's the case. (Note: they are not legal in the
not-yet-I-don't-think-approved UTF-32.)
Peter
Peter Constable wrote:
>
> >It is expected that no characters will ever be
assigned in
> >Unicode that require the five-byte and six-byte UTF-8
forms, so
> >you can consider the maximum for UTF-8 to be four
bytes.
>
> You can, in fact, state this more strongly: *No
characters will
> ever be assigned* in Unicode that require the
five-byte and
> six-byte UTF-8 forms. Based on recent WG2 decisions (I
think
> they made this decision last month), the same is true
for ISO
> 10646. All that's left now would be to formally change
the
> definition for UTF-8 to eliminate the five- and
six-byte forms.
Do they intent to deprecate private use characters in the
ranges 00E00000
to 00FF0000 and 60000000 to 7FFFFFFF?
As far as I know, for the moment there are available for use,
at least with UCS-4 (I understand they should be avoided if
using UTF-32).
Antoine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT