On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:49:39AM -0800, Erland Sommarskog wrote:
> >From what I have groked about Privat Use Area on this list, I'm surprised
> that there is even is a discussion in this case. If the symbol for "The
> Artist Formely Known as Prince" is a clear-cut case for the Private
> Use Area, I fail to see why the logotype of a certain software association
> is not.
1) The prince symbol was not invented by the artist. It is an old Egyptian
2) The copyleft sign is not a logo, but a functional character analoguously
to the copyright sign. This has been discussed in length and proved amply.
We shouldn't iterate eaten stuff like the cows do.
Bernd Warken <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT