Re: Property error for U+2118?

• Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: ConScript registry?"
• Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: ConScript registry?"
• Maybe in reply to: John O'Conner: "Property error for U+2118?"
• Next in thread: Murray Sargent: "RE: Property error for U+2118?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John O'Conner wrote:

> Is this an error or intentional change? I noticed that all other
> "SCRIPT CAPITAL *" character values are in the "Lu" category.
> However, this particular character has changed to "So" in the 3.0,
> 3.0.1, and 3.1 db. Why? Why not the other SCRIPT CAPITAL * char
> values too?
>
> 2118;SCRIPT CAPITAL P;So;0;ON;;;;;N;SCRIPT P;;;;

It is intentional.

Despite its name, U+2118 is not any old script P, but
the unique symbol for the Weierstrass function. Note that it is *not*
unified, in Unicode 3.1, with MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT CAPITAL P, which
has its own codepoint U+1D4AB and category Lu.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: ConScript registry?"
• Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: ConScript registry?"
• Maybe in reply to: John O'Conner: "Property error for U+2118?"
• Next in thread: Murray Sargent: "RE: Property error for U+2118?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT