Unicode Mail List Archive
By Author

Starting: Fri Dec 01 2000 - 02:55:16 EST
Ending: Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:29:44 EST

• 11digitboy@bolt.com
  • Unicode font repository? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 00:23:28 EST)
  • Hex numbers in kanji?? (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 07:46:19 EST)
  • sayounara (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 23:25:43 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Wed Dec 13 2000 - 14:51:50 EST)
  • Did I do this right? (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 00:28:07 EST)
• AbdulMalik
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:31:41 EST)
• addison@inter-locale.com
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:48:52 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 06:51:25 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 10:57:52 EST)
  • Re: FW: Problems with Unicode to EUC-JP (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 15:52:54 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Sat Dec 09 2000 - 12:29:15 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Sat Dec 09 2000 - 06:25:17 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 06:15:42 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 04:48:57 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 03:54:42 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 02:47:47 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 02:35:25 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 07:20:10 EST)
• akerbeltz.alba
  • Re: radicals (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:49:51 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 05:16:08 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, - Cantonese (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 15:47:54 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:49:50 EST)
• Alain laBonté
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 09:28:02 EST)
• Alain LaBonté 
  • Re: (SC22WG20.3355) Talking about cultures, see this surprising thesis (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:22:35 EST)
  • Talking about cultures, see this surprising thesis (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 08:09:01 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 23:50:36 EST)
  • Re: Teletext mappings (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 15:44:06 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:39:21 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:45:04 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 10:35:01 EST)
  • Re: [Sort of OT] 15 minutes of fame for James Do (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:39:11 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 09:23:07 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 11:53:49 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 14:15:39 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 12:35:25 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 12:20:18 EST)
  • Re: Multiple internets (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 13:21:09 EST)
  • Re: Multiple internets (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 19:11:04 EST)
  • Multiple internets (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 13:27:35 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 11:58:02 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 09:44:50 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:06:37 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:33:36 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:27:25 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:12:49 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:37:13 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 14:58:18 EST)
  • [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 10:08:03 EST)
  • Re: Topicality of Postings (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 19:42:58 EST)
• Alan Wood
  • Enigma Browser supports Unicode (Thu Dec 28 2000 - 12:27:25 EST)
• Alex Bochannek
  • Re: Plane 1 Mathematical Alphanumerics and physical quantities. (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:59:07 EST)
  • Plane 1 Mathematical Alphanumerics and physical quantities. (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:37:50 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 12:46:13 EST)
• alimjan
  • hiytinglargha mubarek!!! yingi yilinglargha mubarek!!! (Tue Dec 26 2000 - 22:12:53 EST)
  • Help Me?, Thak's your vre much (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 06:13:26 EST)
  • Help Me?, Thak's your vre much (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 06:11:24 EST)
  • ..... (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 03:49:27 EDT)
  • Thank's your for helpme! (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 03:37:06 EDT)
  • I got? (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 23:16:07 EDT)
  • ת·¢: I have a drem one day I can see the Uighur characters in unicode table! (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 01:07:52 EDT)
  • Unicode and Visual Basic? (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 00:09:02 EDT)
• Alistair Vining
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 21:59:24 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 16:28:23 EST)
  • RE: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 10:10:55 EST)
• Allan Chau
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:46:00 EST)
  • UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 19:45:58 EST)
• Anders Karl Keller
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:48:49 EST)
• Andrew Cunningham
  • [OT] Re: relation between unicode and font (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 22:04:41 EST)
  • Re: eot and pfr files (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 02:12:29 EST)
• Antoine Leca
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:29:30 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 07:22:19 EST)
  • Re: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:35:19 EST)
  • Re: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:24:21 EST)
  • Re: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 13:18:54 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 13:47:19 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 14:41:26 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 11:23:36 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:35:03 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 05:53:27 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:45:45 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:41:09 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:27:24 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:50:50 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:43:31 EST)
  • Re: Unicode to Greek translation of Euro sign (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 06:34:34 EST)
  • Re: Myanmar questions (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 06:30:11 EST)
  • Myanmar questions (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 11:14:51 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:16:45 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:43:16 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry in chinesse (Only in chinesse?) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:02:03 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:27:41 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 06:29:50 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:21:41 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:04:21 EST)
  • Re: OT: Linguae franca (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 12:24:59 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 05:04:07 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:02:08 EST)
• Apurva Joshi
  • RE: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 14:13:36 EST)
• Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 05:42:24 EST)
• Asmus Freytag
  • Re: [OT] reciting program code (was: [idn] nameprep forbidden characters) (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 04:06:49 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 01:23:25 EST)
  • Re: Clarification of character classes (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 19:25:06 EST)
  • Re: Character map (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 14:42:28 EST)
  • Re: Unicode Technical Reports (Formerly: RE: TR22) (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 23:04:26 EST)
  • Fwd: linotype & linotipisti (Sun Dec 10 2000 - 01:17:53 EST)
  • Re: Unicode Technical Reports (Formerly: RE: TR22) (Sun Dec 10 2000 - 01:18:24 EST)
• Ayers, Mike
  • RE: Off topic: language death in the US (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:36:51 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:20:25 EST)
  • RE: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:07:40 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:24:21 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:53:57 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 21:02:39 EST)
  • RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 19:42:34 EST)
  • Tengwar and Cirth (was: RE: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:35:50 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 17:57:55 EST)
  • RE: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:33:52 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:20:05 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 15:32:46 EST)
  • Kang Jie introduction? (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:37:39 EST)
• Becker, Joseph
  • RE: Does anyone know what language is this? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 16:50:19 EST)
• Bertrand Laidain
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 08:20:16 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 13:36:56 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 17:40:00 EST)
• Beth Kaseman
  • Internationalization meeting (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 13:15:09 EST)
• Brahim Mouhdi
  • extracting words (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:27:52 EST)
• Brendan Murray/DUB/Lotus
  • Re: Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 06:07:04 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:34:49 EST)
  • RE: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 06:58:32 EST)
  • Re: off-topic overview of standards (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:24:21 EST)
  • Re: UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:08:14 EST)
  • Re: Labanotation (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:37:06 EST)
• Carl W. Brown
  • RE: Request for information - Subset of Unicode character set (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 17:15:27 EST)
  • RE: Again sorry to talk about APL (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:13:26 EST)
  • RE: APL (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:07:26 EST)
  • RE: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 11:23:40 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 12:44:34 EST)
  • RE: Problem with MSIE 5.0 for Macintosh ( known bug?) (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 12:42:28 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:59:33 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:49:05 EST)
  • RE: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:48:55 EST)
  • RE: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:27:20 EST)
  • RE: UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 14:44:38 EST)
  • UCD 3.1, Final Beta - Case folding (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 11:19:46 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 13:42:14 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 13:21:25 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 03:28:40 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 03:04:09 EST)
  • Help with Greek special casing (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:55:40 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 14:45:02 EST)
  • Unicode to Greek translation of Euro sign (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 17:13:14 EST)
  • Special casing clarification (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 21:22:31 EST)
  • RE: Time Intervals (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:04:55 EST)
  • RE: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:57:42 EST)
  • RE: Time Intervals (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:01:42 EST)
  • RE: [OT] Close to latin (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 00:59:20 EST)
  • RE: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 00:49:08 EST)
  • RE: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:38:38 EST)
  • RE: FAQ !? (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 11:18:19 EST)
  • RE: [OT] Arabic script langs in 3.0 ; list? (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 11:49:26 EST)
• Cathy Wissink
  • RE: Bidi/Hebrew Identifiers (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 10:59:13 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:09:37 EST)
  • RE: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:50:28 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i n (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:49:32 EST)
  • RE: I have a drem one day I can see th (Sat Dec 16 2000 - 11:14:47 EST)
• Charles
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:31:26 EST)
  • I have a drem one day I can see th (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 14:32:23 EST)
• Charlie Jolly
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:26:06 EST)
  • Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:38:37 EST)
• Christopher John Fynn
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 21:11:22 EST)
  • RE: fictional scripts revisited (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 03:04:32 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 19:00:55 EST)
  • RE: More rambling about Han (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 18:37:10 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 05:02:38 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 03:06:31 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 20:06:10 EST)
  • RE: conjuncts beginning with independent vowel? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:27:20 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:14:40 EST)
  • RE: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 12:50:26 EST)
• Christopher Vance
  • Re: [ very OT ] why abjad ..? ; list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 19:44:45 EST)
• Curtis Clark
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 02:01:14 EST)
  • Re: Introducing uniengine technology (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 22:01:34 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 10:21:04 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 00:46:37 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 00:28:57 EST)
  • Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:34:35 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:51:54 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:39:08 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:27:59 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 20:45:28 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 23:00:30 EST)
• Dan Kolis
  • LISP ii (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:29:38 EST)
  • Again sorry to talk about APL (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:36:32 EST)
  • APL (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:58:51 EST)
  • Unicode comprimises (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 11:13:32 EST)
  • Double impact (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 10:38:39 EST)
  • Well (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:31:43 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness ii (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 15:35:27 EST)
  • Close enough (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:17:49 EST)
  • Klingon? take a look (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:49:58 EST)
  • Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:51:22 EST)
  • Electronic form of Labanotation / MPEG 4 BAP's (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:31:22 EST)
  • Electronic form of Labanotation (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:04:04 EST)
• Daniel Biddle
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 08:59:02 EST)
  • RE: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:39:21 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:32:51 EST)
  • Re: Electronic form of Labanotation (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:09:03 EST)
• Darya Said-Akbari
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:26:30 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 09:05:08 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 07:19:42 EST)
  • Convert TTF to BDF with ttf2bdf (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 16:18:55 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 17:40:17 EST)
  • Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 10:59:35 EST)
  • Re: Looking for a Bidi Editor with Java Sources (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 10:40:41 EST)
  • Looking for a Bidi Editor with Java Sources (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 09:34:17 EST)
  • Re: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 09:06:51 EST)
• David Gallardo
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 22:56:20 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 03:19:05 EST)
  • Re: Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:11:18 EST)
  • Re: Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 10:44:36 EST)
  • Re: 8-bit ASCII (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:22:29 EST)
  • Re: Hebrew (was RE: Unicode Transcriptions) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 12:52:30 EST)
• David J. Perry
  • Re: Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 10:19:30 EST)
• David Sitsky
  • Re: Reading Unicode codes from a text file in JSP (Was RE:posting of unicode data to servlet) (Sun Dec 03 2000 - 17:31:52 EST)
• David Starner
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 15:10:08 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 18:24:34 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 19:33:53 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:13:43 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:54:32 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 13:40:32 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 21:26:51 EST)
  • Re: Unicode to Greek translation of Euro sign (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 20:37:28 EST)
  • Re: FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 15:01:54 EST)
  • Re: conversion of e-mail addresses (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 15:05:40 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:26:29 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:25:46 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:13:18 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: UTF-8 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 17:04:45 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 18:18:48 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:41:09 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 19:11:11 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:49:40 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:01:52 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:58:13 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:13:36 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:10:53 EST)
  • UTF8_1 & UTF8_2 (Odd and F) (and encoding translators) (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 23:49:48 EST)
  • Re: conversion of ascii to utf-8 (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 02:13:37 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 10:44:12 EST)
• David Tooke
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 15:09:12 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 13:32:17 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:49:53 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 11:36:51 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 11:13:56 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 17:06:53 EST)
  • OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 16:40:42 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:26:10 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:10:03 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:23:26 EST)
  • OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 12:04:10 EST)
• Dembek, Raymond F
  • Effect on file size when using extended fonts in Word 2000 (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 09:10:35 EST)
• Dennis L. Goyette Sr.
  • Re: Globalization question. (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 07:23:55 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:01:51 EST)
• Dominic
  • Re: Kang Jie introduction? (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:48:48 EST)
• Doug Ewell
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 14:52:25 EST)
  • [OT] Multilingualism (was: Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue...) (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 14:52:26 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 02:13:08 EST)
  • [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 12:09:44 EST)
  • Re: operating system support (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 01:53:55 EST)
  • Re: Downloading the Unicode Standard (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 01:42:25 EST)
  • Copy of: Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Sat Dec 09 2000 - 13:16:25 EST)
  • Re: displaying Unicode text (was re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 02:27:02 EST)
• Doug Schiffer
  • CNS codepoint question... (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 01:43:06 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:16:22 EST)
• DougEwell2@cs.com
  • Re: TRON (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:11:48 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:18:45 EST)
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:48:59 EST)
  • Re: Problem with MSIE 5.0 for Macintosh ( known bug?) (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:18:51 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 10:09:55 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 01:20:02 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 01:16:37 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 11:22:25 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 00:01:41 EST)
  • Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 11:53:58 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 03:13:28 EST)
  • Re: Close enough (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 00:07:13 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:17:27 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 20:04:58 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 12:33:48 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:19:48 EST)
  • Re: Do 16 bit surrogate high bits indicating characters have a persisting mea... (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:15:58 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 11:48:30 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 00:48:05 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 00:48:07 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:27:04 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:27:02 EST)
  • Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 21:04:23 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 11:44:28 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 11:44:25 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 02:55:37 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 01:29:25 EST)
  • [OT?] Re: extracting words (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:29:16 EST)
  • Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 11:44:59 EST)
  • Re: Cross posting (was Fwd: Character encoding systems for Arabic Web pages ?) (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 11:20:13 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: incomplete tags considered harmless/useful (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 02:25:00 EST)
  • Fwd: Character encoding systems for Arabic Web pages ? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 02:25:02 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 09:49:53 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 00:26:54 EST)
  • TRON (was: Re: Benefits of Unicode) (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 01:38:29 EST)
  • Re: off-topic overview of standards (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:32:56 EST)
• dvdeug@hushmail.com
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 23:41:49 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 20:25:44 EST)
• Edward Cherlin
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 05:19:15 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 05:05:36 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 19:10:14 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 04:09:14 EST)
  • RE: What about musical notation? (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 03:44:52 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 19:22:25 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:59:23 EST)
  • [OT] Re: Kang Jie introduction? (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:00:45 EST)
  • Re: Copyright problems (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 03:07:22 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 01:48:49 EST)
• Elaine Keown
  • [OT] terminology: BMP, UCS 3 questions (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:47:28 EST)
  • [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65,536 ; misc Semitic ?s (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 11:18:22 EST)
  • [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 10:53:56 EST)
  • ConScript registry? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 14:27:22 EST)
  • [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 17:15:31 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:22:21 EST)
  • Japanese in Arabic , Javanese (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:15:39 EST)
  • [ very OT ] why abjad ..? ; list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:58:04 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 14:16:26 EST)
  • expansion of bidi planned? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 18:58:05 EST)
  • boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:49:09 EST)
  • bidi or multi algorithm? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:39:05 EST)
  • Aramaic by any other name......... (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 19:30:05 EST)
  • [OT] Arabic script langs in 3.0 ; list? (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 17:39:24 EST)
• Elizabeth J. Pyatt
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 09:11:25 EST)
• Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:19:39 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:52:06 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 12:15:36 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 08:54:13 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Fri Dec 29 2000 - 20:30:21 EST)
• EnsoCompany
  • Labanotation (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:28:50 EST)
• Eric Mader
  • Initial and Medial Alef Maksura (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:06:35 EST)
  • Re: Looking for a Bidi Editor with Java Sources (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 12:38:59 EST)
• Erik Garrés
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:41:52 EST)
  • Chemistry in chinesse (Only in chinesse?) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:23:46 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:46:11 EST)
  • Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:07:02 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 23:45:50 EST)
  • Sorry, I found it. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:24:06 EST)
  • What about musical notation ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:08:08 EST)
• Erik van der Poel
  • Re: displaying Unicode text (was Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 03:48:20 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 00:44:12 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 19:44:27 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 17:29:22 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 01:25:26 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 01:21:04 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 02:05:26 EST)
• Erland Sommarskog
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:30:49 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 18:40:29 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:46:57 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 17:30:05 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 17:17:38 EST)
  • Re: OT: Linguae franca (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 18:43:28 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 16:08:43 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Dec 26 2000 - 17:54:58 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 19:29:48 EST)
  • RE: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 19:15:35 EST)
• EthiO Systems
  • Ethiopic font: "Ethiopia Jiret" (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 04:25:37 EST)
• F. Avery Bishop
  • [Sort of OT] 15 minutes of fame for James Do (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 12:07:44 EST)
• Fady Elias
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:21:23 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:37:02 EST)
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:46:02 EST)
  • Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:02:07 EST)
• Figge, Donald
  • RE: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:49:56 EST)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 06:53:08 EST)
• Francesco Zappa Nardelli
  • Re: Close enough (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 07:14:32 EST)
• Frank da Cruz
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 10:42:48 EST)
  • RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 10:07:50 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 15:15:27 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:57:22 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:25:00 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:44:31 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 17:56:38 EST)
  • UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 16:35:46 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 18:01:07 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:44:51 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:49:19 EST)
  • Re: Unicode-aware FTP client (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:46:32 EST)
  • Re: Unicode-aware FTP client (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:22:53 EST)
  • Unicode-aware FTP client (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 19:00:38 EST)
  • Unicode-aware ftp client (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 18:04:45 EST)
• G. Adam Stanislav
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 11:19:23 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 10:25:29 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:57:31 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 07:20:39 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 07:05:45 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 01:22:09 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 18:00:48 EST)
  • Re: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 23:20:47 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:36:00 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:34:01 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:28:28 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:27:28 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 10:15:54 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 10:47:38 EST)
• Gaute B Strokkenes
  • Re: Handling UTF-8 (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 12:51:40 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 12:09:14 EST)
• Geoffrey Waigh
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 13:33:04 EST)
• George Zeigler
  • Arabic MySQL Perl (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 12:42:48 EST)
• Glen Perkins
  • UTF-8 support in Mac & AOL browsers (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 13:40:55 EST)
• Gregg Reynolds
  • Re: FW: Persian alphabet (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 23:18:19 EST)
  • Re: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:17:39 EST)
• Guy Schockaert
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 13:10:30 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Dec 26 2000 - 03:41:30 EST)
• Halldor G. Gestsson
  • Languages vs. collection of code subsets (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 04:17:22 EST)
• Handwerker, Reinhard (ISS Atlanta)
  • RE: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 14:24:37 EST)
  • RE: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:46:07 EST)
• Hart, Edwin F.
  • Request for Information on Unicode fonts (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 16:31:42 EST)
  • Translate son's name into Cherokee? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:59:48 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:13:35 EST)
  • RE: Stability problems with "Arial Unicode MS" Font (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 08:38:13 EST)
  • RE: 8-bit ASCII (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 10:14:03 EST)
  • RE: 8-bit ASCII (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:01:33 EST)
  • RE: 8-bit ASCII (was: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 08:37:43 EST)
  • 8-bit ASCII (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:23:18 EST)
  • RE: Property-Problems (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 20:37:16 EST)
• Herman Ranes
  • Errors [Re: Teletext mappings] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:57:38 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:41:08 EST)
• hiura@eng.sun.com
  • Re: TRON (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 08:22:06 EST)
  • Re: TRON (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 15:26:00 EST)
• Hohberger, Clive
  • RE: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 23:03:41 EST)
• Houman Pournasseh
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:50:18 EST)
  • RE: URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 14:41:46 EST)
  • RE: URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 13:50:12 EST)
• Ienup Sung
  • Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 22:36:23 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:12:54 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:52:38 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 22:01:22 EST)
  • [OT] RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 21:18:20 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 21:08:42 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 20:47:32 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:38:39 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:37:27 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:42:42 EST)
• J M Sykes
  • Re: Unicode and ISO terminology (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 04:54:43 EST)
  • Re: Unicode and ISO terminology (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:21:20 EST)
  • Unicode and ISO terminology (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 13:24:03 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 06:29:30 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:10:56 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation] (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 12:05:37 EST)
  • Fw: Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation] (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 13:26:38 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 05:59:36 EST)
  • The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 12:45:56 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - Khmer/Cambodian (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:23:26 EST)
  • Re: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:33:16 EST)
  • Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 08:14:31 EST)
  • Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 07:17:27 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 07:10:10 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 06:42:58 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:31:14 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:22:08 EST)
• J%ORG KNAPPEN
  • Script of Elbasan and other Albanian Alphabets (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 04:32:32 EST)
  • Re: Albanian alphabet (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 04:16:16 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 06:33:58 EST)
  • utf-1.3 and utf-1.4 (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 11:57:47 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 04:04:44 EST)
  • Re: Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 04:26:08 EST)
  • Re: Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 04:19:48 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:02:06 EST)
  • Esperanto (estis: [OT] Close to latin) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 04:31:24 EST)
  • Re: Information about curly-tailed phonetic letters (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 04:33:05 EST)
• J.Schneider@epixtech.com
  • Does anyone know what language is this? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 16:31:09 EST)
• Jaap Pranger
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 12:20:40 EST)
• James
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW - Unicode round-tripping policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 00:29:42 EST)
• James E. Agenbroad
  • Indic Scripts Page (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 13:57:13 EST)
  • RE: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 11:44:34 EST)
  • Re: languages on Web (was Re: Unicode market acceptance) (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:35:10 EST)
  • Re: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:59:32 EST)
  • Daniels and Bright Tibetan Query (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:33:11 EST)
  • Order of bidi script numbers in ranges (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:52:17 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:27:01 EST)
• James Kass
  • Re: Handling UTF-8 (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 06:49:47 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:07:31 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 18:34:09 EST)
  • Re: Search of a malayalm database (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:11:33 EST)
  • Re: Multiple internets (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 00:33:50 EST)
  • Re: Character map (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 17:07:22 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 12:53:32 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 12:43:21 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 11:11:48 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 08:46:35 EST)
  • Re: Did I do this right? (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 07:29:20 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 05:52:25 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 03:27:11 EST)
  • Re: displaying Unicode text (was re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 00:04:12 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 22:54:18 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 20:07:56 EST)
  • Re: eot and pfr files (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 11:30:26 EST)
• James Partridge
  • Re: Off topic: language death in the US (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:59:00 EST)
• Janusz S. Bieñ
  • Re: 8-bit ASCII (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:44:01 EST)
  • Re: 8-bit ASCII (was: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 01:03:19 EST)
• jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com
  • RE: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 18:28:18 EST)
  • RE: Alphabet vs. script (was RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bi t (w (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:11:28 EST)
  • RE: Tengwar and Cirth (was: RE: Fictional scripts revisited, migh t as (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:23:35 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 13:34:55 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 11:21:35 EST)
  • RE: Unicode 3.1 update? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:40:31 EST)
  • Unicode 3.1 update? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 11:50:43 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:06:59 EST)
• Jeff Guevin
  • Re: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:59:31 EST)
  • 19th century "Unicode" (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 09:04:32 EST)
• jgo
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 19:26:22 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 17:51:28 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 19:03:43 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:48:14 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 16:26:46 EST)
• Jianping Yang
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 17:55:38 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 19:37:14 EST)
  • Re: Oracle 8 and custom sorting (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:38:37 EST)
• Jim Melton
  • RE: 8-bit ASCII (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:09:59 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation] (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 20:33:03 EST)
• Joan Aliprand
  • Tenth anniversary of the Unicode Consortium (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 16:30:46 EST)
• Joel Rees
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:46:05 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:40:15 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:35:10 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:04:54 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:33:22 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 02:14:37 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 22:40:51 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 22:29:23 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:20:17 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:06:59 EST)
  • Re: More rambling about Han (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 05:00:08 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 04:40:38 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:06:29 EST)
  • Re: More rambling about Han (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:01:23 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 23:03:50 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 03:40:32 EST)
  • More rambling about Han (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 02:16:15 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65 (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 06:33:33 EST)
• John Cowan
  • Re: (SC22WG20.3355) Talking about cultures, see this (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:18:12 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:28:13 EST)
  • Re: Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:34:54 EST)
  • Re: Close enough (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 10:28:30 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 15:07:32 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 14:30:08 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 13:24:40 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 10:47:30 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:11:54 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:21:27 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 14:41:33 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:17:16 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 11:51:54 EST)
  • Re: Unicode terminology (RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 10:56:19 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 14:18:05 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 16:26:05 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 12:56:21 EST)
  • Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 11:43:24 EST)
  • Unicode 3.1: incomplete tags considered harmless/useful (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:01:47 EST)
  • Unicode 3.1: Georgian (editorial) (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:41:10 EST)
  • Unicode 3.1: UTF-8 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:40:15 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:33:20 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:20:32 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:13:58 EST)
  • Re: off-topic overview of standards (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:09:37 EST)
  • Re: Sarasvati (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:54:22 EST)
  • Sarasvati (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:03:55 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:17:06 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:46:03 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:44:01 EST)
  • Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:04:40 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:35:53 EST)
  • Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:03:38 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:13:53 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Close to latin (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 09:10:18 EST)
  • Re: OT: Linguae franca (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 09:01:36 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 11:09:07 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:45:24 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 11:13:33 EST)
  • Update 3.1 (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:29:22 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 12:05:51 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 10:55:11 EST)
  • Re: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 09:31:38 EST)
  • Re: Font help (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 13:14:19 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 13:08:31 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 13:06:58 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:45:55 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:17:05 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 10:35:59 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 16:49:57 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 16:26:13 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:52:55 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:51:07 EST)
• John H. Jenkins
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 13:39:00 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 13:35:41 EST)
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 18:16:10 EST)
  • Re: Close enough (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 18:01:25 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:56:19 EST)
  • Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:11:27 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:25:47 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:47:54 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:55:59 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 12:36:53 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 12:33:40 EST)
  • Re: Non-Latin Vietnamese in Unicode (Thu Dec 28 2000 - 11:36:08 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 04:15:50 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 04:18:07 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 22:58:39 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 19:34:15 EST)
• John Hudson
  • Re: Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:37:05 EST)
  • Re: Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:22:47 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 10:08:03 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:46:08 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:49:31 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:33:04 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:21:34 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:16:14 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:43:51 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:36:29 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:17:04 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 00:12:42 EST)
• John Jenkins
  • Re: CNS codepoint question... (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:53:59 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:30:40 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:51:01 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 22:57:07 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:27:58 EST)
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:36:41 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 14:23:49 EST)
  • Re: Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:58:38 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 11:31:18 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:44:02 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:37:15 EST)
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:33:00 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:32:49 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:20:45 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 17:21:41 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:50:11 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:46:21 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:18:20 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:16:22 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:24:15 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:37:12 EST)
  • An unexpected sight... (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:14:12 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:06:09 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:08:12 EST)
  • Re: Combining macron on Mac (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 20:38:42 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 18:23:19 EST)
  • Re: bidi or multi algorithm? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 14:12:00 EST)
  • Re: Non-Latin Vietnamese (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 11:45:35 EST)
  • Re: FW: Problem of translation: Wordperfect/Mac to Word (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 20:14:30 EST)
• John O'Conner
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:32:26 EST)
  • Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:53:00 EST)
  • Re: Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 13:20:11 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 19:00:04 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 15:13:22 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 12:32:10 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 12:53:21 EST)
  • Property error for U+2118? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:16:28 EST)
  • U+FFFE and U+FFFF part of "Specials" block? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:21:39 EST)
• John Wilcock
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 03:15:07 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Wed Dec 13 2000 - 03:49:37 EST)
• Jon Babcock
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 19:28:06 EST)
• Jonathan Coxhead
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:56 EST)
  • Re: Updates to Technical Reports (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 19:59:54 EST)
• Jonathan Lewis
  • Re: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 09:13:47 EST)
• Jonathan Rosenne
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:44:57 EST)
  • Bidi/Hebrew Identifiers (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 01:01:14 EST)
  • RE: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 00:08:03 EST)
  • RE: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 15:33:36 EST)
  • RE: Hebrew shaping (was RE: Benefits of Unicode) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 07:13:24 EST)
  • RE: Hebrew (was RE: Unicode Transcriptions) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 10:42:19 EST)
  • RE: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 12:42:34 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:08:54 EST)
  • RE: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:47:58 EST)
  • RE: Order of bidi script numbers in ranges (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:43:02 EST)
  • RE: [ very OT ] why abjad ..? ; list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:37:52 EST)
  • RE: Hebrew final kaf issues (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 17:05:12 EST)
  • Israeli HTML Specification (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 11:46:30 EST)
  • RE: List style type names (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 16:35:32 EST)
  • RE: (bidi) Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 14:11:10 EST)
• Jones, Bob
  • Citrix Metaframe and MFC Apps (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:40:25 EST)
• Joshua W Biagio
  • Hebrew final kaf issues (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 04:25:31 EST)
• Jukka Korpela
  • Re: Combining macron on Mac (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 02:41:18 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 02:13:08 EST)
• Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 07:42:03 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 04:11:09 EST)
  • Re: multilingual editors (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 01:34:12 EST)
  • Re: New Unicode Website items (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 04:33:21 EST)
  • Re: character mapping (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 03:15:35 EST)
  • Re: conversion of ascii to utf-8 (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 02:32:00 EST)
• Julie Doll Allen
  • RE: Oh Unicode (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 00:32:03 EST)
  • Revised 3.1 posted (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 18:33:23 EST)
  • Korean Line breaking and Editorial Tracking (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 16:54:51 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:02:28 EST)
  • PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 21:40:51 EST)
• Jungshik Shin
  • Re: [OT] 19th century "Unicode" (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:54:30 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:18:23 EST)
  • PKS C 5700(was..Re: New BMP characters) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 20:41:39 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 20:36:25 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 08:32:27 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 14:31:27 EST)
  • Re: Korean Line breaking and Editorial Tracking (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 12:56:28 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 12:32:15 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 12:10:04 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 01:08:04 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:11:41 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:05:19 EST)
  • Re: Korean linebreking and UTR14(was Re: extracting words) (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 23:43:01 EST)
  • [OT]RE: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:57:58 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:44:59 EST)
  • Korean linebreking and UTR14(was Re: extracting words) (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 16:58:33 EST)
  • Re: [OT] RE: FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 19:00:26 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 03:47:14 EST)
  • Re: Unicode before Unicode (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 12:13:11 EST)
  • Unicode before Unicode (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 12:03:16 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:59:40 EST)
  • Re: List style type names (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 13:30:19 EST)
• Karlsson Kent - keka
  • RE: FW: Ericsson introduces T29 for the Asian markets (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 07:33:10 EST)
• Katsuhiko Momoi
  • Combining macron on Mac (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 17:44:03 EST)
  • Re: Did I do this right? (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 01:13:01 EST)
  • Re: displaying Unicode text (was Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 04:38:27 EST)
• Keber, Wolfgang
  • RE: Effect on file size when using extended fonts in Word 2000 (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 10:29:02 EST)
• Keld Jørn Simonsen
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 05:36:47 EST)
  • Unicode and ISO terminology (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 05:21:46 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 17:51:30 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:50:56 EST)
  • Re: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 18:01:40 EST)
  • Re: Unicode to Greek translation of Euro sign (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 17:56:04 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:48:21 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 12:34:44 EST)
• Kenneth Whistler
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 21:29:45 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:40:51 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 21:40:26 EST)
  • Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 21:12:16 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3-1, Musical Notation, Tempus, Tempo (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:28:31 EST)
  • Re: Unicode and ISO terminology (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 18:48:46 EST)
  • Re: Bidi 3.1.0 (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 17:29:21 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:54:29 EST)
  • Re: Spacing diacritics in Greek Extended (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:12:49 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 00:26:57 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 23:51:01 EST)
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 15:28:35 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 19:19:56 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 18:06:03 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 14:48:17 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 22:50:35 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:59:17 EST)
  • Math formulae (was Re: What about musical notation?) (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:41:43 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 19:01:18 EST)
  • CJK workers, throw off you chains! (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 22:24:31 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 22:32:12 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65 (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:51:37 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65 (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:43:20 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:10:29 EST)
  • Unicode character encoding statistics (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 14:26:25 EST)
  • Re: Four characters from Greek Extended block missing? (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 14:00:11 EST)
  • Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65,536 ; misc Semitic ?s (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 13:20:18 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 13:06:46 EST)
  • RE: Unicode Transcriptions (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 12:43:17 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 15:37:32 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - Khmer/Cambodian (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 21:39:45 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 15:22:20 EST)
  • Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 14:01:51 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1 update? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:43:05 EST)
  • Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:46:39 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:39:00 EST)
  • RE: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:34:06 EST)
  • Re: Plane 1 Mathematical Alphanumerics and physical quantities. (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:38:12 EST)
  • Re: Serious problems with Arabic (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:06:13 EST)
  • Re: missing bopomofo letter? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:55:05 EST)
  • Re: U+FFFE and U+FFFF part of "Specials" block? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:41:08 EST)
  • Representation of aspiration (was: Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:38:27 EST)
  • Re: Copyright problems (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:28:58 EST)
  • Rhyming Serendipity (was Re: Esperanto (estis: [OT] Close to latin)) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 14:02:46 EST)
  • RE: Ambiquous compositions (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 21:14:10 EST)
  • Re: Does anyone know what language is this? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 16:44:25 EST)
  • Re: expansion of bidi planned? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 19:32:40 EST)
  • Mongolian and Uighur (was Re: I have a drem one day...) (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 14:20:39 EST)
  • Re: I have a drem one day I can see th (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 12:43:28 EST)
  • Re: Update 3.1 (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 20:32:47 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 22:40:50 EST)
  • Re: Property-Problems (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 20:46:14 EST)
  • Re: FW: Unicode 0x0453 - 0x045f (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 14:08:46 EST)
• kline_s@cup.hp.com
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 22:12:21 EST)
• Krishna Desikachary
  • Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 23:13:30 EST)
  • (no subject) (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 20:36:10 EST)
• Lars Marius Garshol
  • Rendering Unicode on the Mac (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:55:07 EST)
  • Re: Again sorry to talk about APL (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 02:44:43 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 15:49:18 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:57:09 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:15:46 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:11:23 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 09:10:43 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 08:09:05 EST)
  • GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 05:33:49 EST)
• Lateef Sagar
  • Font for Kurdish (Arabic Script) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:59:00 EST)
• Lisa Moore
  • Re: FW: Question on IBM's Unicode enabled product Support. (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 00:49:55 EST)
  • Re: UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:18:47 EST)
• lisam@us.ibm.com
  • 18th Unicode Conference, April 2001, Hong Kong -- Register now! (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:16:56 EST)
  • Re: UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:00:46 EST)
  • 18th Unicode Conference, April 2001, Hong Kong -- Register now (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:34:45 EST)
• Lukas Pietsch
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensuralnotation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 19:58:55 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 12:53:03 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 08:44:01 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 04:28:57 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 03:22:23 EST)
  • Re: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 03:35:06 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 08:03:55 EST)
  • Re: Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 03:15:27 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 07:49:37 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 16:41:21 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:48:39 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:27:48 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:47:25 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 06:42:59 EST)
• Magda Danish (Unicode)
  • FW: Persian alphabet (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 17:54:17 EST)
  • FW: Request for information - Subset of Unicode character set (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:29:27 EST)
  • FW: Arabic Script. (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 14:24:38 EST)
  • FW: I have a question about KSC5601 (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:05:02 EST)
  • FW: Doubt about XML (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 13:37:09 EST)
  • FW: Expert opinions solicited (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 12:09:23 EST)
  • FW: conversion of e-mail addresses (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 13:26:48 EST)
  • FW: Unicode und TeX for Roumanian (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 20:30:04 EST)
  • FW: Question on IBM's Unicode enabled product Support. (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 13:25:13 EST)
  • list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 12:43:40 EST)
  • FW: sorting algorithm (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:51:12 EST)
  • FW: Unicode, Korean, Windows ME, and Tired Eyes (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 12:53:14 EST)
  • FW: Search of a malayalm database (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:20:52 EST)
  • FW: sqare root in java applets (Fri Dec 29 2000 - 12:32:27 EST)
  • FW: Half-hearted Progress with Unicode... (Thu Dec 28 2000 - 15:05:00 EST)
  • Free Unicode Proceedings (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 14:26:17 EST)
  • FW: Problems with Unicode to EUC-JP (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 13:34:46 EST)
  • FW: convert EUC-JP and ISO-2022-JP to unicode (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 14:57:15 EST)
  • FW: Problem of translation: Wordperfect/Mac to Word (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 17:10:30 EST)
  • Looking for software for Japanese (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:18:47 EST)
  • FW: Character map (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 12:47:34 EST)
  • FW: Unicode 0x0453 - 0x045f (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 13:46:10 EST)
• Majid Bhurgri
  • Re: URDU fonts (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 01:39:42 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Arabic script langs in 3.0 ; list? (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 23:37:47 EST)
  • Re: display problems on browser (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 10:08:50 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 00:32:54 EST)
• Makarand Gadre
  • RE: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 02:29:20 EST)
• Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 15:29:28 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 16:21:02 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 03:55:58 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 03:53:57 EST)
  • Re: Teletext mappings (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 15:16:36 EST)
• Marco Cimarosti
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:59:32 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:46:21 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:00:18 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 08:52:58 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 07:51:19 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 06:20:01 EST)
  • RE: Javascript Chart 2 (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 04:22:14 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 12:55:34 EST)
  • Javascript Chart 2 (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 12:08:45 EST)
  • Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 11:57:52 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:24:44 EST)
  • RE: Off topic: language death in the US (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 05:23:18 EST)
  • RE: Font for Kurdish (Arabic Script) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:22:06 EST)
  • RE: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:03:50 EST)
  • RE: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:41:55 EST)
  • Joining group "WAW" (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 06:57:13 EST)
  • RE: Stability problems with "Arial Unicode MS" Font (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 06:07:50 EST)
  • RE: Arabic Script. (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 05:51:45 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 04:50:10 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:24:09 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 05:03:33 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 04:42:07 EST)
  • [OT] 19th century "Unicode" (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:34:58 EST)
  • RE: Javascript Chart (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 05:16:34 EST)
  • Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:08:34 EST)
  • RE: Romanche dash (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:46:16 EST)
  • RE: UCD 3.1, Final Beta Review Period (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 04:44:39 EST)
  • RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 04:11:51 EST)
  • RE: Handling UTF-8 (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 06:12:17 EST)
  • RE: Handling UTF-8 (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 05:08:34 EST)
  • RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 04:58:39 EST)
  • RE: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 12:59:32 EST)
  • RE: Well (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:34:43 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:44:23 EST)
  • Alphabet vs. script (was RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (w as: Re: Surrogate space i) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:18:40 EST)
  • RE: Question on Unicode data files (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 10:14:07 EST)
  • Question on Unicode data files (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:49:05 EST)
  • RE: Armenian Eternity Sign (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 07:20:02 EST)
  • Hebrew shaping (was RE: Benefits of Unicode) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 06:00:12 EST)
  • Armenian Eternity Sign (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 05:04:04 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i n (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 04:45:43 EST)
  • RE: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 04:53:56 EST)
  • RE: Do 16 bit surrogate high bits indicating characters have a pe rsisting meaning please? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 08:33:37 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 06:06:44 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 05:56:47 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 05:29:15 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:07:40 EST)
  • [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:54:05 EST)
  • Unicode terminology (RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 06:54:59 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 04:17:51 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i n Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 04:58:56 EST)
  • RE: Languages vs. collection of code subsets (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 04:35:48 EST)
  • RE: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyon d 65 (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 07:49:02 EST)
  • Re: Arabic MySQL Perl (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 07:33:46 EST)
  • New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65 ,536 ; misc) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 04:33:18 EST)
  • RE: Unicode Transcriptions (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 05:10:18 EST)
  • re: Unicode Transcriptions (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 04:38:38 EST)
  • RE: conversion of e-mail addresses (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 13:50:36 EST)
  • RE: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:29:17 EST)
  • RE: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 09:36:37 EST)
  • OT: apologizing (was RE: Chemistry in chinesse (Only in chinesse? )) (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:28:07 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:50:38 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:33:59 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry in chinesse (Only in chinesse?) (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:31:32 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:33:53 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:30:27 EST)
  • RE: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:35:54 EST)
  • RE: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:35:45 EST)
  • RE: Teletext mappings (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:35:14 EST)
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:38:34 EST)
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:45:42 EST)
  • RE: An unexpected sight... (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:36:05 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:03:31 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 03:40:22 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 11:33:48 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 06:36:43 EST)
• Marion Gunn
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 13:17:19 EST)
• Mark Davis
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:27:00 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:17:52 EST)
  • Updates to Technical Reports (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 19:38:09 EST)
  • Re: Help with Greek special casing (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 10:53:41 EST)
  • UCD 3.1, Final Beta Review Period (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 20:25:56 EST)
  • Re: collation sequences (was Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 09:56:43 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 00:06:34 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 16:02:21 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 11:57:20 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 10:19:42 EST)
  • Collation (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 14:35:20 EST)
  • Unicode Transcriptions (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 11:22:36 EST)
  • Re: Korean linebreking and UTR14(was Re: extracting words) (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 09:53:31 EST)
  • Re: Korean linebreking and UTR14(was Re: extracting words) (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 22:53:52 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation] (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 16:26:37 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 15:55:30 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 14:19:06 EST)
  • Navigator 6 question (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 13:13:07 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - Khmer/Cambodian (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 12:47:43 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 13:12:31 EST)
  • Proposed Update: UAX #19: UTF-32 (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 15:29:39 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 11:14:20 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 11:46:33 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 22:56:43 EST)
  • Re: Time Intervals (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 22:49:39 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:40:03 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: UTF-8 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 22:23:27 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:12:17 EST)
  • Re: Time Intervals (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 00:17:48 EST)
  • Re: Unicode 3.1: IDS and ZW(N)J (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:15:25 EST)
  • Re: Time Intervals (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:57:50 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:05:54 EST)
  • Re: A real bug in bidi (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:32:23 EST)
  • Re: UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:27:00 EST)
  • Re: A real bug in bidi (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:35:41 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:13:47 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 10:15:43 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:57:52 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 01:43:57 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode": Still Missing scripts (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 01:41:14 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:51:36 EST)
  • Transcriptions of "Unicode": Still Missing scripts (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 00:22:36 EST)
  • Re: Reverse Bidi Algorithm (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:55:18 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:49:40 EST)
  • Re: (SC22WG20.3292) 14651 draft table updated (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 12:30:40 EST)
  • New Unicode Website items (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 18:33:03 EST)
  • Re: sqare root in java applets (Fri Dec 29 2000 - 12:54:34 EST)
  • Re: Bug in Bidi (Tue Dec 26 2000 - 14:45:48 EST)
  • Re: Bug in Bidi (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 00:28:48 EST)
  • Beta Unicode Character Database 3.1 (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 17:36:58 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 23:01:49 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 11:34:18 EST)
  • Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 10:31:54 EST)
  • Re: displaying Unicode text (was Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:20:33 EST)
  • displaying Unicode text (was Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 20:59:15 EST)
  • TR22 (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 16:14:44 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 15:58:25 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 13:09:25 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 10:44:06 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 01:13:09 EST)
  • Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 16:59:00 EST)
  • Re: display problems on browser (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 09:39:27 EST)
• Mark Leisher
  • NISO creates OpenURL standard committee (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:32:57 EST)
  • RE: extracting words (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:14:08 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:51:14 EST)
  • HTML-only messages (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 11:37:28 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 18:26:39 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 15:11:54 EST)
  • Re: Convert TTF to BDF with ttf2bdf (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 16:31:19 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 18:18:30 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 16:13:16 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 15:22:44 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 11:21:00 EST)
• Markus Scherer
  • Re: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 12:11:40 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:50:04 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:13:05 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 15:12:25 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:20:46 EST)
  • Re: UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:42:22 EST)
  • ICU 1.7 released (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 19:50:41 EST)
  • Re: FAQ !? (Wed Dec 13 2000 - 12:38:46 EST)
  • gb 18030 mapping available (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 14:45:24 EST)
• Martin J. Duerst
  • New position at W3C: Web Internationalization (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 06:59:56 EST)
  • Reminder: I18N at WWW10: Call for Participation (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 03:46:11 EST)
• Maurice Bauhahn
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - Khmer/Cambodian (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 23:40:48 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 01:06:21 EST)
• Michael (michka) Kaplan
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:48:18 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:15:30 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 12:54:14 EST)
  • Re: Character map (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 14:20:40 EST)
  • Re: your guidance (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 10:23:50 EST)
  • Re: conversion of ascii to utf-8 (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 02:23:06 EST)
• Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
  • Re: Persian alphabet (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 18:14:00 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:21:41 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:37:05 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:19:29 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:41:27 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:39:14 EST)
  • Re: Stability problems with "Arial Unicode MS" Font (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 08:53:32 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 15:26:00 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:21:04 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 12:51:15 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 21:13:51 EST)
  • Re: Globalization question. (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 09:15:36 EST)
  • Re: Thai and Sqlserver 7? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:35:56 EST)
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:00:14 EST)
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:22:46 EST)
  • Re: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:28:27 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 16:58:40 EST)
  • Re: Klingon? take a look (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:28:26 EST)
  • Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:10:09 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 09:22:08 EST)
  • Re: Do 16 bit surrogate high bits indicating characters have a persisting mea... (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:45:36 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 14:13:22 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 01:09:36 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:31:15 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:20:38 EST)
  • Re: extracting words (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 16:00:25 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 17:41:13 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 08:05:50 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:13:39 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:50:51 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:48:53 EST)
  • Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:33:22 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:01:25 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 12:15:17 EST)
  • Re: Labanotation (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:41:28 EST)
  • Re: Unicode, Korean, Windows ME, and Tired Eyes (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 06:43:17 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW - Unicode round-tripping policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 00:49:10 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:09:00 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:24:24 EST)
  • Re: Help Me?, Thak's your vre much (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 08:28:20 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 17:00:54 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:07:26 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 01:48:53 EST)
  • Re: Problems with Unicode to EUC-JP (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 15:50:00 EST)
  • Re: Effect on file size when using extended fonts in Word 2000 (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 09:24:49 EST)
  • Re: Thank's your for helpme! (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 07:24:45 EST)
  • Re: Thank's your for helpme! (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 07:23:11 EST)
  • Re: I have a drem one day I can see th (Sat Dec 16 2000 - 11:58:09 EST)
  • Re: I have a drem one day I can see th (Sat Dec 16 2000 - 02:37:44 EST)
  • Re: Unicode and Visual Basic? (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 05:52:02 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 23:10:13 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 14:25:30 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 15:29:45 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 14:51:10 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:17:15 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:37:45 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 12:36:03 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 02:07:29 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 01:41:48 EST)
  • Re: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 10:24:48 EST)
  • Re: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 09:40:15 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 00:40:55 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 00:36:38 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 18:39:11 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 14:36:05 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 13:23:14 EST)
  • Re: eot and pfr files (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 10:47:52 EST)
• Michael Everson
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:40:34 EST)
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 05:58:19 EST)
  • Off topic: language death in the US (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:31:32 EST)
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:36:40 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 06:20:57 EST)
  • Re: Script of Elbasan and other Albanian Alphabets (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 11:17:45 EST)
  • peccavi (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 13:00:14 EST)
  • Re: [OT] 19th century "Unicode" (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:59:17 EST)
  • Re: Albanian alphabet (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 05:16:56 EST)
  • Re: Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:51:43 EST)
  • Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 09:37:17 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 10:35:15 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 05:50:48 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 13:59:30 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 08:34:51 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:27:06 EST)
  • Re: Klingon? take a look (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:02:19 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:50:58 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:00:06 EST)
  • Re: Tengwar and Cirth (was: RE: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:05:46 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 06:31:11 EST)
  • Re: Armenian Eternity Sign (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 06:16:58 EST)
  • Re: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 06:14:33 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 06:13:35 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 14:38:53 EST)
  • Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 07:48:42 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:40:25 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:02:41 EST)
  • Re: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:14:03 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 12:42:18 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:41:41 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:34:14 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 09:33:14 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 07:20:15 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 07:21:19 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 07:06:10 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 07:15:37 EST)
  • Re: special marks in Bengali poetry (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:10:08 EST)
  • Re: special marks in Bengali poetry (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 06:02:23 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 05:51:19 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 06:13:25 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:52:27 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:33:01 EST)
  • RE: conjuncts beginning with independent vowel? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:44:48 EST)
  • ZWJ and CGJ (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 05:52:31 EST)
  • Smiths (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:48:17 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:08:28 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:05:51 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:56:40 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:59:23 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:06:37 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:07:54 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:51:46 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 12:36:56 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 05:48:54 EST)
  • RE: Font help (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 05:37:34 EST)
  • Early Semitic (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:54:41 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 06:41:02 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 08:07:15 EST)
  • OT: Linguae franca (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 09:08:47 EST)
  • Roadmap update (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 09:50:38 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:35:43 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:10:12 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:07:31 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:27:10 EST)
  • Re: L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 09:36:40 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 19:13:22 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:14:20 EST)
  • Uighur script (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 11:12:59 EST)
  • Re: Information about curly-tailed phonetic letters (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 07:24:36 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 12:20:12 EST)
  • Font help (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:49:02 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 07:35:29 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:29:03 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:25:21 EST)
• Mike Brown
  • RE: list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:40:03 EST)
• Mike Lischke
  • RE: Navigator 6 question (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 15:07:18 EST)
  • re: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 14:57:31 EST)
  • RE: FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 14:39:38 EST)
  • FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 13:09:01 EST)
  • algorithm to shorten a string (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 10:28:26 EST)
  • RE: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:48:17 EST)
  • FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:55:57 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:30:08 EST)
  • Ambiquous compositions (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 03:41:00 EST)
• Misha Wolf
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:02:27 EST)
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 17:54:16 EST)
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 17:34:16 EST)
  • Call for Papers - 19th Unicode Conference - September 2001 - San Jose, CA (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 14:19:55 EST)
  • 18th Unicode Conference, April 2001, Hong Kong -- Register now! (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 13:51:32 EST)
  • FW: Ericsson introduces T29 for the Asian markets (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 05:54:57 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 13:54:48 EST)
  • Last Call review of Character Model for the WWW (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:40:25 EST)
  • Re: Electronic form of Labanotation (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:24:41 EST)
  • "Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages" published today (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 15:07:47 EST)
• Multi-Linguist
  • URDU fonts (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 01:02:20 EST)
  • URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 22:58:50 EST)
• Murray Sargent
  • RE: Property error for U+2118? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:42:57 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:30:21 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 21:09:13 EST)
• Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
  • RE: Myanmar questions (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 04:02:28 EST)
  • RE: Myanmar questions (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 00:29:32 EST)
• N.R.Liwal
  • Re: Thank's your for helpme! (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 03:49:51 EST)
• Nat Langs
  • Additional characters in GBK vs GB 2312-80 (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 20:07:13 EST)
• Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • Re: Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 10:19:59 EST)
  • Re: 21 bits ... (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:19:07 EST)
  • Re: Unicode und TeX (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 21:02:22 EST)
• Nesbitt, Gavin
  • Reference for: Printing errors when using Unicode fonts? (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 15:44:22 EST)
  • OT: Keycap stickers? (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:46:11 EST)
• Nick NICHOLAS
  • Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:34:49 EST)
  • Albanian alphabet (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:14:46 EST)
  • Spacing diacritics in Greek Extended (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 18:57:10 EST)
  • Re: Klingon? take a look (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:27:32 EST)
  • Re: Klingon? take a look (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:25:12 EST)
  • Re: Four characters from Greek Extended block missing? (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 16:19:02 EST)
• Nick Nicholas
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 03:27:03 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 12:02:29 EST)
  • RE: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:46:55 EST)
  • Re: Help with Greek special casing (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 00:28:53 EST)
• nikita k
  • Surrogate space in Unicode (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 05:16:20 EST)
  • Creating an Input Method (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 23:29:38 EST)
• Nitin_Goel@i2.com
  • FAQ !? (Wed Dec 13 2000 - 00:37:47 EST)
• Otto Stolz
  • Re: Romanche dash (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:29:13 EST)
  • Re: Romanche dash (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 11:59:23 EST)
  • Re: Romanche dash (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:20:55 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 05:00:40 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:32:01 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 05:03:43 EST)
  • Four characters from Greek Extended block missing? (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 14:16:37 EST)
  • Re: [OT] reciting program code (was: [idn] nameprep forbidden (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 05:21:17 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:13:25 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:39:13 EST)
  • Re: Teletext mappings (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:54:06 EST)
  • [OT] earlier this century (was: An unexpected sight...) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:24:01 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:10:14 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 09:11:44 EST)
• Ozair Rasheed
  • Introductions (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 01:28:05 EST)
• P. T. Rourke
  • Re: Close enough (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 08:27:15 EST)
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:40:39 EST)
  • Re: Close enough (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 16:22:28 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:23:46 EST)
  • Re: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001 (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 11:14:19 EST)
  • Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 12:11:38 EST)
  • Phaistos Disk (was Re: ConScript registry?) (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:31:07 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:45:40 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 09:10:59 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry in Chinese (Only in Chinese?) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:12:56 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:39:27 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:16:21 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:41:42 EST)
  • Re: Enigma Browser supports Unicode (Thu Dec 28 2000 - 13:05:48 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 17:35:46 EST)
• Pam Lothspeich
  • remapping devanagari (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 15:08:45 EST)
• Pan, Jenny
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:50:47 EST)
• pandries@iti.qc.ca
  • OT Unicode terminology (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 11:17:36 EST)
  • RE: [ very OT ] list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:16:05 EST)
  • RE: [ very OT ] list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 16:15:29 EST)
• Parvinder Singh(EHPT)
  • Japanese display on Unix netscape ? (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 08:59:58 EST)
• Patrick Andries
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensuralnotation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:24:09 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:11:13 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 11:16:55 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 08:05:10 EST)
  • Unicode 3-1, Musical Notation, Tempus, Tempo (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 22:56:24 EST)
  • Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 22:24:49 EST)
  • Musical Notation 3.1 (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:09:17 EST)
  • Tr: Romanche dash (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 10:50:34 EST)
  • Romanche dash (Sun Mar 04 2001 - 18:12:43 EST)
  • French -- Quelques nouveaux chapitres du standard Unicode en ligne (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 16:57:35 EST)
  • Syriac questions (erratum ?) (Sun Dec 31 2000 - 22:32:18 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 11:09:23 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Fri Dec 29 2000 - 22:43:45 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 20:14:48 EST)
  • [OT] Relatinisation (Mon Dec 25 2000 - 20:08:24 EST)
• Patrick T. Rourke
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensural notation (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:21:51 EST)
  • Re: Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:51:27 EST)
  • Re: Help with Greek special casing (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 23:53:51 EST)
  • Re: Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 07:35:12 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 17:41:04 EST)
  • Re: Greek questions, on- and off-topic (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:00:49 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:08:45 EST)
• Paul Keinanen
  • Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 20:50:04 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 02:59:01 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:54:03 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Sat Dec 30 2000 - 16:22:14 EST)
• Peck, Jon
  • RE: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 17:20:18 EST)
• Peter_Constable@sil.org
  • Re: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 12:29:10 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 11:43:41 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:58:56 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:11:22 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:07:30 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:01:48 EST)
  • Re: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 10:17:29 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:29:07 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:15:22 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:35:07 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:28:07 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:41:37 EST)
  • languages on Web (was Re: Unicode market acceptance) (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:15:27 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 09:03:53 EST)
  • Re: Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:26:31 EST)
  • RE: Globalization question. (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:50:56 EST)
  • Re: Javascript Chart (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:48:25 EST)
  • Re: Unicode and ISO terminology (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 11:42:09 EST)
  • summary on sign language notation systems (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 09:48:49 EST)
  • ELL: Aboriginal Language TV Series (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 20:22:47 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 09:11:59 EST)
  • Re: Close enough (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:53:56 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 10:01:27 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:58:49 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:19:09 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:54:58 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 08:47:25 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:53:30 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:09:22 EST)
  • Re: Introducing uniengine technology (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:00:33 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:09:22 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:54:58 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:58:49 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 10:01:27 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:19:09 EST)
  • Re: Introducing uniengine technology (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:00:33 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 08:47:25 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 09:31:04 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 09:16:53 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 09:10:49 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 15:15:31 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 15:06:04 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 14:59:20 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 09:39:26 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:51:23 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 18:23:41 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 13:51:17 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 13:33:23 EST)
  • Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 13:31:43 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 12:37:19 EST)
  • Re: Scripts and alphabets (was: Perception ...) (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 16:52:33 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 01:10:28 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:44:02 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:39:37 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:22:52 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:20:49 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:08:32 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:57:12 EST)
  • Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:37:07 EST)
  • RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:00:25 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 08:49:07 EST)
  • Hebrew (was RE: Unicode Transcriptions) (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 00:17:24 EST)
  • Re: remapping devanagari (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 00:42:13 EST)
  • running headers in vertical page layout (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 17:51:17 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 09:01:16 EST)
  • Re: The normalization form of the result of a dyadic operation. (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 17:40:26 EST)
  • [OT] book binding (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 18:22:59 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 08:44:55 EST)
  • Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:15:38 EST)
  • Re: Property error for U+2118? (Thu Feb 01 2001 - 13:33:39 EST)
  • Re: special marks in Bengali poetry (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 08:59:02 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 18:11:17 EST)
  • special marks in Bengali poetry (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 17:00:24 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:42:20 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 09:54:12 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 09:42:20 EST)
  • Rational (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:48:26 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:39:10 EST)
  • RE: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:07:35 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:01:26 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:13:28 EST)
  • RE: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:49:02 EST)
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:17:42 EST)
  • anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:42:20 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:32:56 EST)
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:03:01 EST)
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:37:39 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:43:55 EST)
  • RE: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:58:43 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:49:11 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:24:31 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:29:02 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:03:38 EST)
  • Re: conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:15:48 EST)
  • conjucts beginning with independent vowel? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:09:37 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:30:32 EST)
  • RE: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 12:30:54 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:52:11 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:55:40 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:34:00 EST)
  • passing of a linguistic patriarch (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:29:38 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:48:09 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 10:26:27 EST)
  • RE: Ambiquous compositions (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:50:54 EST)
  • Re: Ambiquous compositions (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:20:51 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:17:47 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:10:27 EST)
  • UIghur (was Re: Thank's your for helpme!) (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 10:36:45 EST)
  • Re: I have a drem one day I can see th (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 13:17:07 EST)
  • your guidance (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 08:46:54 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:10:03 EST)
  • not all compatibility characters are created equal (was Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 11:54:39 EST)
  • Re: URDU fonts (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 13:47:52 EST)
  • Indic support in Windows (was Re: eot and pfr files) (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 10:42:39 EST)
• Pierpaolo BERNARDI
  • Re: Pentagrams: (was: RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:13:26 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 00:36:25 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 16:45:55 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 16:58:01 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 08:42:34 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:38:41 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:24:21 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:39:52 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:59:46 EST)
  • Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:37:58 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:23:54 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:33:09 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:21:44 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 12:01:51 EST)
• pierre vaures
  • Stability problems with "Arial Unicode MS" Font (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 03:39:14 EST)
• Polykarpos Karamaoynas
  • Handling UTF-8 (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 09:06:15 EST)
  • Handling UTF-8 (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 08:32:17 EST)
• Raghu Kolluru
  • RE: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:36:12 EST)
  • RE: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:29:45 EST)
  • international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:00:29 EST)
• Richard Cook
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:22:15 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:26:11 EST)
  • Oh Unicode (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 20:23:50 EST)
  • Re: Kana, was re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:29:13 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:23:33 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:21:03 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:17:52 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, - Cantonese (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:15:36 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 14:10:28 EST)
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 00:12:41 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 18:04:50 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 02:32:27 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 00:47:15 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 13:03:54 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:59:30 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:21:44 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:10:36 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:27:06 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:47:16 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:39:26 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:44:05 EST)
  • Re: Representation of aspiration (was: Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode") (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 15:55:30 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:16:37 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 11:17:17 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 22:57:09 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 19:00:14 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 13:48:41 EST)
  • Linguistic Transcription list (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 14:34:16 EST)
  • Re: Mongolian and Uighur (was Re: I have a drem one day...) (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 11:15:40 EST)
  • Re: Information about curly-tailed phonetic letters (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 02:26:23 EST)
  • Chinese Support (Wed Dec 13 2000 - 19:25:46 EST)
  • Re: curly-tailed phonetic letters (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 19:08:25 EST)
  • Re: curly-tailed phonetic letters (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 14:22:47 EST)
• Richard Zhang
  • Re: Question on Unicode data files (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:16:39 EST)
• Richard, Francois M
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:36:30 EST)
  • RE: Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 07:32:47 EST)
  • Plain text in Java ResourceBundle (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 14:45:23 EST)
  • RE: 8-bit ASCII (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 08:39:15 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:14:26 EST)
• Rick McGowan
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:43:49 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 --Mensuralnotation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:44:55 EST)
  • Albanian alphabet (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:34:22 EST)
  • Re: Square and lozenge notes -- Musical Notation 3.1 -- Mensuralnotation (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 15:19:03 EST)
  • Re: Musical Notation 3.1 (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:56:20 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (was: Re: Klingon silliness) (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 12:58:13 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 12:42:07 EST)
  • Web Application with UTF8 support (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 12:13:57 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 15:33:11 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:06:38 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 13:35:52 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:50:18 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 16:07:47 EST)
  • Re: bidi or multi algorithm? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:58:12 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:54:10 EST)
• Rob Hardy
  • Re: Teletext mappings (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:52:45 EST)
  • Re: Teletext mappings (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:43:51 EST)
  • Teletext mappings (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:02:33 EST)
• ROBERT HODGSON
  • RE: Unicode Transcriptions (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 12:06:39 EST)
• Robert Wheelock
  • Unicode Technical Reports (Formerly: RE: TR22) (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 01:30:40 EST)
• Robin Cover
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Fri Dec 22 2000 - 01:21:34 EST)
  • Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 23:29:21 EST)
• Roozbeh Pournader
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 17:17:08 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 15:50:05 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 15:20:57 EST)
  • Re: Arabic sorting [was Re: FW: Persian alphabet] (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 09:45:17 EST)
  • RE: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 13:39:22 EST)
  • RE: FW: Persian alphabet (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 10:38:20 EST)
  • Re: FW: Persian alphabet (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 19:47:46 EST)
  • Re: FW: Persian alphabet (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 19:00:30 EST)
  • Re: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:43:53 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:05:17 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 19:18:26 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:59:39 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:46:39 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:23:47 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:02:30 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:17:49 EST)
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:06:03 EST)
  • [OT] Re: APL (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:08:38 EST)
  • Re: Unicode web ring! (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 06:52:05 EST)
  • Re: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:54:14 EST)
  • Bidi 3.1.0 (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 15:44:55 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 23:47:45 EST)
  • Re: [OT] book binding (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 07:38:18 EST)
  • Re: algorithm to shorten a string (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 12:44:11 EST)
  • Re: Serious problems with Arabic (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:40:29 EST)
  • Re: Order of bidi script numbers in ranges (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:07:10 EST)
  • Re: Serious problems with Arabic (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:50:00 EST)
  • Re: A real bug in bidi (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:56:57 EST)
  • Re: [ very OT ] why abjad ..? ; list--Arabic script languages (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:32:47 EST)
  • Reverse Bidi Algorithm (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:27:12 EST)
  • Re: Initial and Medial Alef Maksura (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:40:48 EST)
  • Copyright problems (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 03:07:47 EST)
  • A real bug in bidi (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 09:16:03 EST)
  • Bug in Bidi (Tue Dec 19 2000 - 05:11:58 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 15:02:02 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 15:33:11 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:17:15 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or right-to-left. (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 13:05:28 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 17:59:56 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 16:48:10 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 16:10:10 EST)
  • Re: Keymap for Iranian Keyboards (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 15:16:05 EST)
  • Oracle 8 and custom sorting (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 13:50:23 EST)
  • Persian decimal/currency separator (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 15:11:23 EST)
  • RE: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 11:17:59 EST)
  • Re: please expand re bidi algorithm (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 11:05:56 EST)
  • Re: sequences and stuff (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 06:14:20 EST)
• rscook@socrates.Berkeley.EDU
  • Re: Tribble-kissing, was Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:50:41 EST)
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:01:43 EST)
  • Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:53:45 EST)
• Russ Rolfe
  • RE: Creating an Input Method (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:27:21 EST)
• Sam Chapman
  • RE: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:38:56 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:13:50 EST)
  • Microsoft Word Query (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 06:09:13 EST)
• Sarasvati
  • Moving mail lists (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 18:53:20 EST)
  • Change of web service (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 14:04:30 EST)
  • Re: New position at W3C: Web Internationalization (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 12:47:42 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 18:31:19 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 14:20:52 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:45:19 EST)
  • Topicality of Postings (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 18:43:16 EST)
• Sean O Seaghdha
  • RE: Javascript Chart (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 00:45:48 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 01:17:45 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:58:20 EST)
  • Re: international characters in email subject line (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 23:17:50 EST)
• Sebastian Hagedorn
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 13:15:48 EST)
  • Re: Macintosh OS8.6, OS9 (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 17:02:36 EST)
• Seán Ó Séaghdha
  • Inverted breve in Greek? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 02:41:01 EST)
• Shigemichi Yazawa
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 16:03:50 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of Unicode (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 14:17:26 EST)
• Song Moong Er
  • UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-16 unicode format files (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 20:44:32 EST)
  • Testing - please ignore [eom] (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 18:51:40 EST)
• sreekant
  • arabic and japanese (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:13:21 EST)
  • relation between unicode and font (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 03:23:50 EST)
  • multilingual editors (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 00:25:20 EST)
  • Font Support (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 00:05:31 EST)
  • operating system support (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 00:03:01 EST)
  • character mapping (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 02:24:11 EST)
  • conversion of ascii to utf-8 (Mon Dec 11 2000 - 01:40:04 EST)
  • eot and pfr files (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 07:43:59 EST)
• Stephen Cremin
  • Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 21:50:38 EST)
• Steve Cushion
  • Re: Arabic MySQL Perl (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 05:00:28 EST)
• Sujit Sunthankar
  • RE: Reading Unicode codes from a text file in JSP (Was RE:posting of unicode data to servlet) (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 21:48:57 EST)
  • RE: display problems on browser (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 03:15:14 EST)
• Suzan Gallerito
  • Re: Multiple internets (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 15:37:22 EST)
• Suzanne M. Topping
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:43:41 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:58:00 EST)
  • RE: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:23:27 EST)
  • Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:12:43 EST)
  • TRON (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:07:21 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:00:59 EST)
  • RE: Unicode market acceptance (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 14:49:57 EST)
• Suzanne Topping
  • OFF TOPIC Re: Sarasvati (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:10:43 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 09:51:26 EST)
• Tague Griffith
  • Thai and Sqlserver 7? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:41:59 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 02:07:07 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 21:54:58 EST)
  • Re: Java text editor supporting utf-8 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:33:08 EST)
  • Java text editor supporting utf-8 (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 21:23:05 EST)
• TAKAHASHI Makoto
  • RE: Looking for software for Japanese (Tue Dec 12 2000 - 21:00:18 EST)
• Ted Peck
  • RE: Rational (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:00:23 EST)
• Tex Texin
  • Re: Unicode complaints (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:50:23 EST)
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:11:47 EST)
  • Re: Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 17:57:24 EST)
  • Unicode webring (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 16:29:58 EST)
  • Re: Unicode web ring! (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 10:51:30 EST)
  • Unicode web ring! (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 04:39:07 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 21:23:42 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:59:37 EST)
  • Re: languages on Web (was Re: Unicode market acceptance) (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:48:04 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 12:23:15 EST)
  • Re: Unicode market acceptance (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 02:28:12 EST)
  • Unicode market acceptance (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:38:28 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 16:23:00 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 03:10:02 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 03:21:19 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 02:15:46 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 14:01:28 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 17:35:56 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 02:01:47 EST)
  • Re: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:05:34 EST)
  • collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:24:52 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 23:28:31 EST)
  • Re: Unicode collation algorithm - interpretation] (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 15:03:10 EST)
  • Re: FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 13:46:56 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 15:48:23 EST)
  • Re: Bastardizations of UTF-8 (was: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?) (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 12:58:17 EST)
  • Benefits of Unicode (no, really!) (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:20:05 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:47:35 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:31:02 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 16:08:20 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 15:53:24 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 15:31:37 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:49:32 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:32:29 EST)
  • Benefits of Unicode w/2columns (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:20:15 EST)
  • Benefits of Unicode w/2columns (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 20:16:52 EST)
  • Benefits of Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:45:40 EST)
  • off-topic overview of standards (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:14:18 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:48:02 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 00:31:15 EST)
  • Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ? (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:26:05 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Fri Dec 08 2000 - 14:14:36 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 14:54:05 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 14:35:42 EST)
  • Re: OT (Kind of): Determining whether Locales are left-to-right or (Thu Dec 07 2000 - 12:40:00 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 17:44:00 EST)
• thejokrishna
  • RE: Problem with MSIE 5.0 for Macintosh ( known bug?) (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:45:08 EST)
  • Problem with MSIE 5.0 for Macintosh ( known bug?) (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:39:42 EST)
  • RE: Handling UTF-8 (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:44:30 EST)
  • Web Application with UTF8 support (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 05:30:28 EST)
  • Random behaviour with Netscape/IE 5.0 for UTF8 support....Help! (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 01:24:59 EST)
• Thomas Chan
  • Re: TRON (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:58:33 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 11:55:42 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 18:41:06 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 11:19:10 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:40:22 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 19:13:34 EST)
  • Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 19:00:16 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 14:55:19 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 15:10:34 EST)
  • Re: Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 13:09:49 EST)
  • Re: fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 15:09:56 EST)
  • Re: More rambling about Han (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:42:12 EST)
  • RE: [OT] What is DEL for? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 10:28:17 EST)
  • fictional scripts revisited (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 01:52:36 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 18:47:35 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 18:43:24 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:22:21 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 08:35:15 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond 65 (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 00:10:29 EST)
  • RE: Unicode Transcriptions (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 06:22:02 EST)
  • [OT] RE: FW: extracting words (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 14:59:57 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:46:32 EST)
  • Re: ConScript registry? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:18:18 EST)
  • Re: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 20:04:08 EST)
  • RE: Benefits of Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:01:59 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:14:22 EST)
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:39:32 EST)
  • missing bopomofo letter? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:50:57 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 11:08:41 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode": Still Missing scripts (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:57:16 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 08:27:51 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:46:11 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW - Unicode round-tripping policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 10:26:18 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 10:01:01 EST)
  • Re: Kang Jie introduction? (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:35:25 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 12:09:30 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 08:16:45 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 14:18:19 EST)
  • Re: nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:47:53 EST)
  • nushu? (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 10:42:01 EST)
  • Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode" (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 22:52:32 EST)
• Timothy Partridge
  • RE: Final letters in Hebrew and Arabic (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 16:47:38 EST)
  • Re: Klingon silliness (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 15:49:33 EST)
• Tobias Hunger
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:50:53 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:39:59 EST)
  • Re: An unexpected sight... (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:52:50 EST)
  • Clarification of character classes (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 07:02:41 EST)
  • Re: Property-Problems (Wed Dec 06 2000 - 03:54:39 EST)
  • Property-Problems (Tue Dec 05 2000 - 19:49:19 EST)
• Tom Emerson
  • Re: anyone recognise this? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:50:05 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW - Unicode round-tripping policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:43:28 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:26:34 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:49:19 EST)
  • Re: GBK, HZ and EUC-TW (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 23:19:35 EST)
• Tom Lord
  • Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 03:41:34 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 15:02:36 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:44:41 EST)
  • An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...) (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:39:58 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 03:05:58 EST)
  • Re: Surrogate space in Unicode (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 02:15:15 EST)
  • Unicode database (C library) (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 15:15:34 EST)
  • Unicode regular expression matcher (Thu Dec 14 2000 - 15:14:05 EST)
• tom@bluesky.org
  • Han Literacy Numbers (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:22:20 EST)
  • Re: Combining macron on Mac (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 20:28:08 EST)
  • Non-Latin Vietnamese in Unicode (Thu Dec 28 2000 - 00:00:21 EST)
  • Re: Non-Latin Vietnamese (Thu Dec 21 2000 - 17:04:50 EST)
  • Non-Latin Vietnamese (Wed Dec 20 2000 - 10:33:28 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Arabic script langs in 3.0 ; list? (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 18:26:28 EST)
• tracey kelly
  • UNICODE application on IBM Mainframe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:55:40 EST)
• Trond Trosterud
  • RE: Handling UTF-8 (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 04:28:25 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ericsson introduces T29 for the Asian markets (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 06:53:01 EST)
• Valeriy E. Ushakov
  • Re: Metafont to something real (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:20:14 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 16:18:55 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 14:38:53 EST)
  • Re: [OT] What is DEL for? (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 10:37:25 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 06:51:34 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 04:40:45 EST)
  • Re: Sanskrit Transliteration Characters (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 23:55:35 EST)
  • Re: Daniels and Bright Tibetan Query (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:14:08 EST)
• Vinit Bhatt
  • RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:29:26 EST)
• Werner LEMBERG
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 16:39:06 EST)
  • Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 04:14:27 EST)
• William Overington
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 05:38:57 EST)
  • Re: Latin digraph characters (Wed Feb 28 2001 - 13:01:15 EST)
  • Re: Introducing uniengine technology (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 07:50:38 EST)
  • Possibilities of future expansion (from Perception etc thread and fictional etc thread) (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 04:50:53 EST)
  • Introducing uniengine technology (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 06:34:04 EST)
  • Do 16 bit surrogate high bits indicating characters have a persisting meaning please? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 05:40:35 EST)
  • Re: What about musical notation? (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 07:12:48 EST)
  • Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode) (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:48:08 EST)
  • Re: Esperanto (estis: [OT] Close to latin) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 06:35:54 EST)
• Wong YenChin
  • RE: display problems on browser (Mon Dec 04 2000 - 02:11:14 EST)
• Y M Chan
  • RE: Creating an Input Method (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 01:14:11 EST)
• Yung-Fong Tang
  • Re: [Fwd: Rendering Unicode on the Mac] (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:47:03 EST)
  • Re: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1 (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:15:34 EST)
  • Re: Unicode-aware FTP client (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:42:54 EST)
  • Re: Kang Jie introduction? (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:34:21 EST)
  • Re: Unicode-aware FTP client (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:20:07 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:40:46 EST)
  • Re: relation between unicode and font (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:06:36 EST)
• Yves Arrouye
  • Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 23:53:25 EST)
  • RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:20:06 EST)
• zdzlc@21cn.com
  • (no subject) (Sun Dec 17 2000 - 19:08:35 EST)