Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

• Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "Unicode 3.1 update?"
• Previous message: Elaine Keown: "[ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "[ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Next in thread: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Elaine Keown wrote:

> What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0?

ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000.

> Are there
> ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so
> forth?

No. Typically the properties that are affected by changes to the
third component of the version number don't affect the ISO
version, which has far fewer details.

Roughly speaking, ISO 10646 gives information about *strings*,
whereas Unicode provides information about *text*.

> Also, are the Hebrew sections in the corresponding ISO version the
> same as in Unicode, e.g., is there a main Hebrew block and then an
> "Alphabetic Presentation Forms" section with other Hebrew items?

Yes.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "Unicode 3.1 update?"
• Previous message: Elaine Keown: "[ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "[ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Next in thread: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT