Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)

From: Tobias Hunger (tobias@berlin-consortium.org)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:50:53 EST

Next message: Tex Texin: "Re: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate"
Maybe in reply to: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Next in thread: Paul Keinanen: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tuesday 20 February 2001 19:29, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
> This is something that UTC should clean up because C1 is obsolete. In fact,
> UTC just took that action when they met a couple of weeks ago:

Wow, that's great news for me. I am currently very involved with my studies
and other projects, so I failed to stay current with post 3.0 changes to the
standard:(

I again have to say that I'm sorry for the amount of traffic my simple
oversight has caused on this list.

-- Gruss, Tobias

------------------------------------------------------------------- Tobias Hunger The box said: 'Windows 95 or better' tobias@berlin-consortium.org So I installed Linux. -------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Tex Texin: "Re: collations: Czech vs. Croat vs. Slovak"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate"
Maybe in reply to: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Next in thread: Paul Keinanen: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT