Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i

From: Joel Rees (rees@server.mediafusion.co.jp)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:40:15 EST

Next message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Previous message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Maybe in reply to: Antoine Leca: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi John,

> Or consider IPv6 network addresses. There are
> 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 of them. They
> won't be assigned densely according to current plans,

There are actually still quite a few 32 bit IP addresses not in use. (Does
there exist one computer attached to the Internet for every two people
alive?) The non-dense packing is the reason we are running out.

Joel Rees

Next message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Previous message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Maybe in reply to: Antoine Leca: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT