Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:

From: John Jenkins (jenkins@apple.com)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:37:15 EST

Next message: John Jenkins: "Re: Klingon silliness"
Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: Question on Unicode data files"
Next in thread: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Maybe reply: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Maybe reply: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tuesday, February 27, 2001, at 10:46 AM, Richard Cook wrote:

> * 'Kanji' in Cantonese Chinese (kahn jee; "k" as in 'can', "a" as in
> 'father', "jee" as in 'jeep');

I'm afraid it's not "kanji" but "hanji" in Cantonese. Sorry.

Next message: John Jenkins: "Re: Klingon silliness"
Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: Question on Unicode data files"
Next in thread: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Maybe reply: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Maybe reply: Thomas Chan: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT