Re: UTF-17

From: John Cowan (cowan@mercury.ccil.org)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2001 - 00:45:10 EDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Not the Roadmap was Re: UTF-17"
Previous message: Richard Cook: "Re: Not the Roadmap was Re: UTF-17"
In reply to: Roozbeh Pournader: "RE: UTF-17"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: UTF-17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Roozbeh Pournader scripsit:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Carl W. Brown wrote:
>
> > If they like length maybe we could encode UTF-32 in '1' and '0' characters
> > for a fixed 21 byte encoding.
>
> Is this a record? UTF-168?

No, no. It's just an extension of UTF-32, so it should be called UTF-33.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Not the Roadmap was Re: UTF-17"
Previous message: Richard Cook: "Re: Not the Roadmap was Re: UTF-17"
In reply to: Roozbeh Pournader: "RE: UTF-17"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: UTF-17"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT