At 14:35 -0400 2001-07-03, Thomas Chan wrote:
>I'm just puzzled by the disappearance of mentions of them in what I can
>find on the publically available parts of the unicode.org and WG2
>websites, even if its just to say that not enough is known about them to
>do anything, e.g., WG2 N1955 (1999.1.26) mentions that there is not enough
>data, WG2 2046 (1999.8.15) and later don't mention them at all, as far as
>I can see.
Do you want the Roadmap Ad-Hoc to look at putting them in
http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/not-the-roadmap.html ? What
category would you recommend? As I say, I think they're ineligible.
If anyone can tell me why the <ol></ol> tags in that document number
out of sequence I'd be delighted to know.
-- Michael Everson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 13:48:07 EDT