At 08:00 +0100 2001-07-06, David Starner wrote:
>Could you find fault with some one who chose not to work with Cham because
>it was in the same "consideration list" as the (dead) Egyptian
>Hieroglyphics?
I don't believe the Vietnamese national body (which originally
sponsored Cham, providing me with a very big Cham dictionary to help)
holds this view. The reason the Vietnamese are not pressing Cham
encoding is that they don't have funds for it now. I can't press it
because I need their input.
-- Michael Everson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 13:48:07 EDT