Hi, Michael
By 'we', do you mean Microsoft? If so, I'm surprised you identify yourself
so closely with that corporation - I thought you were an independent
contractor...
As for the question of whether Microsoft has robbed anyone, I would say that
there are a couple of cases before the courts that bear on that very
question - and that Microsoft hasn't been faring very well in establishing
its innocence! ;^)
Thanks
- rick cameron
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:michka@trigeminal.com]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:06
To: Marco Cimarosti; Dinesh Agarwal; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Rich man Bill (RE: Issues with Unicode Hindi)
Importance: Low
We rob NO ONE. We behave with honor and we wish others to do the same with
us.
Its a respect thing.
MichKa
Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco Cimarosti" <marco.cimarosti@essetre.it>
To: "'Michael (michka) Kaplan'" <michka@trigeminal.com>; "Dinesh Agarwal"
<dineshagarwal2000@hotmail.com>; <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: [OT] Rich man Bill (RE: Issues with Unicode Hindi)
> > [...] but do we rob the rich man because he is rich?
> > (I hope everyone thinks the answer here is no!).
>
> I have been told that this mailing list is not for politics, so let's
stick
> to bare logics:
>
> 1. "we rob the poor man because he is poor"
> 2. "we rob the poor man because he is rich"
> 3. "we rob the rich man because he is poor"
> 4. "we rob the rich man because he is rich"
>
> Do you agree that 2 and 3 are self-contradictory? So the choice is
> between
1
> and 4...
>
> _ Marco
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 13:37:08 EST