Re: Variation Selection

From: $B$m!;!;!;!;(B $B$m!;!;!;(B (juuitchan@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 27 2002 - 21:41:19 EST

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: POSITIVELY MUST READ! Bytext is here!"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Variation Selection"
Next in thread: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Variation Selection"
Next in thread: Barry Caplan: "Re: Variation Selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Unicode list policy is to NOT send attachments to the lists. Please
>post to your server and send the URLs.
>
First, have we all servers?
Second, if it is a small attachment, the number of bytes transmitted to GO
there may well be greater than the number to send the bloody thing. How
about an arbitrary attachment limit of 1535 ($B8lO$9g$o$;!'$R$a$_$3(B) bytes?

$B!!!!"*!!$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!!"+(B
$B!!!!!!$@$s$;$$$i$7$5$`$h$&(B

_________________________________________________________________
$B4JC1$K=PMh$k3Z$7$$%"%k%P%`!#M'C#$KEO$9$N$b%a!<%k$G4JC1$K!*(B
http://photos.msn.co.jp/

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: POSITIVELY MUST READ! Bytext is here!"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Variation Selection"
Next in thread: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Variation Selection"
Next in thread: Barry Caplan: "Re: Variation Selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Jan 27 2002 - 22:07:05 EST