Re: attachment size

From: Sarasvati ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 00:14:32 EST


Dear Little Ones:

Michael E suggested:

> Unicode list policy is to NOT send attachments to the lists.

to which Doug E. replied:

> I just sent a 500-byte attachment to the Unicode list
> without any qualms.

The policy is rather to let the piranhas chew up people who send
huge attachments. Little attachment are not troublesome.

This list has a 52k limit on message body size, regardless
of content, and there is not a specific policy that I care
to enforce about little attachments or mail formats.

Use good judgement, please.

Little [email protected] at hotmail.com suggested using
or Sarasvati's birth year. However, in terms of C.E., that is
an inappropriately large negative number.

By the way, the other day on this list Michael K called
out my name, but I thought you all were reaching the correct
conclusion without interference, and I see the controversy
has blown over.

Cheery regards from your,
        -- Sarasvati



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 01:18:27 EST