Re: Should there be a "UniGlyph" standard?

From: Roozbeh Pournader (roozbeh@sharif.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 05:08:21 EST

On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Hudson wrote:

> Too much of a pain. Last year I migrated all my Arabic and Hebrew glyph
> names to uniXXXX format; since Arabic characters not listed in the Adobe
> Glyph List need uniXXXX names anyway, it simply made more sense to use this
> format consistently for all glyphs.

But won't non-standard glyph names get the user into trouble with some
existing pieces of software?

roozbeh

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 05:27:03 EST