Re: Should there be a "UniGlyph" standard?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 06:30:40 EST


At 13:38 +0330 2002-07-03, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Hudson wrote:
>
>> Too much of a pain. Last year I migrated all my Arabic and Hebrew glyph
>> names to uniXXXX format; since Arabic characters not listed in the Adobe
>> Glyph List need uniXXXX names anyway, it simply made more sense to use this
>> format consistently for all glyphs.
>
>But won't non-standard glyph names get the user into trouble with some
>existing pieces of software?

I don't use illegible names like uniXXXX. I have a whole huge list of
user-friendly names that I use.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 06:45:35 EST