On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, William Overington wrote:
> Here is a system that I think would work.
>
> Consider please that there exists for the private use area the concept of
> the hexadecimal point. The term "hexadecimal point" is similar to the
> concept of a decimal point, the difference being that a decimal point is for
> base 10 numbers and a hexadecimal point is for base 16 numbers.
>
> [snip]
>
Wednesday, March 13, 2002
If we are to have a hexidecimal point should it have a code of its own to
distinguish it from the "." decimal point? U+2394 is an open hexagon
with aflat side down which might serve. Its name, "software-function symbol"
is unclear to me.
Regards,
Jim Agenbroad ( jage@LOC.gov )
"It is not true that people stop pursuing their dreams because they
grow old, they grow old because they stop pursuing their dreams." Adapted
from a letter by Gabriel Garcia Marquez.
The above are purely personal opinions, not necessarily the official
views of any government or any agency of any.
Addresses: Office: Phone: 202 707-9612; Fax: 202 707-0955; US
mail: I.T.S. Sys.Dev.Gp.4, Library of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE,
Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.
Home: Phone: 301 946-7326; US mail: Box 291, Garrett Park, MD 20896.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Mar 13 2002 - 11:36:21 EST