----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Cc: "William Overington" <WOverington@ngo.globalnet.co.uk>
Sent: den 17 mars 2002 01:45
Subject: Re: Synthetic scripts
> The closest I can come is something like "a script that was invented,
> generally by one person and in a relatively short period of time, rather
> than evolving from existing scripts in a gradual and progressive
> manner."
>
> But right away that definition includes not only Shavian, Tengwar,
> Cirth, Klingon, and most of the contents of ConScript, but also
> Ethiopic, Cherokee, Canadian Syllabics, Gothic, Deseret, and maybe Yi
> Syllabics, all of which are already encoded in Unicode.
Wouldn't this also include Italian? Maybe I should propose exclusion of all
characters used in Italian scripts... ;)
Stefan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Mar 17 2002 - 05:19:18 EST