Re[2]: Pronunciation of U+0429

From: Anatoly Vorobey (mellon@pobox.com)
Date: Fri Aug 09 2002 - 09:47:40 EDT

Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Taboo Variants (was Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units )"
In reply to: Radovan Garabik: "Re: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: [unicode] Re[2]: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Reply: Radovan Garabik: "Re: [unicode] Re[2]: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello Radovan,

RG> that is indeed the "official" pronunciation,

No, it really isn't!

RG> and if you ask an (educated) Russian
RG> speaker to slowly pronounce a word with [U+0429] he will pronounce it as
RG> [StS]

No, he really won't!

RG> but I guess it is influenced by orthography.

What's the orthography got to do with it??

-- 
Anatoly Vorobey,
my journal (in Russian): http://www.livejournal.com/users/avva/
mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/
"Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton

Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Taboo Variants (was Re: Digraphs as Distinct Logical Units )"
In reply to: Radovan Garabik: "Re: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: [unicode] Re[2]: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Reply: Radovan Garabik: "Re: [unicode] Re[2]: Pronunciation of U+0429"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 09 2002 - 07:30:51 EDT