Re: Header Reply-To

From: Sarasvati (root@unicode.org)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 13:58:13 EST

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: hacked fonts in MS-Windows: rev. solidus vs Yen/Won"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Lotze: "Header Reply-To"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thomas Lotze asked:

> is there a reason mails from the Unicode list don't have a
> Reply-To header pointing to unicode@unicode.org?

Yes.

This point has been covered before in this forum and isn't open to
negotiation.

Regards,
-- Sarasvati

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: hacked fonts in MS-Windows: rev. solidus vs Yen/Won"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Lotze: "Header Reply-To"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Header Reply-To"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 14:31:06 EST