Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?

From: jameskass@att.net
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 12:57:18 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Coptic II?"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Coptic II?"
Maybe in reply to: John Hudson: "Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

If mathematicians can freely use letters as math symbols, why
can't linguists use math symbols as letters?

In the case you have offered, since these Fraktur letters are
used as variables (indicating sourcing in BHS), it shouldn't be
considered abuse, IMHO.

Best regards,

James Kass.

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Coptic II?"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Coptic II?"
Maybe in reply to: John Hudson: "Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 13:29:48 EST