Re: Morse code

From: Otto Stolz (Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 07:13:04 EST

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "RE: The result of the plane 14 tag characters review."

Previous message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The result of the plane 14 tag characters review."
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Morse code"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Morse code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Radovan Garabik had written:
> Recently I got a crazy idea: why not include Morse code characters
> in unicode?

I had written:
> I was under the impression that all three Morse code elements
> are already in Unicode:
> U+00B7
> U+2013
> U+0020

Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> ·-- ···· ·- - ·----· ··· ·-- ·-· --- -· --· ·-- ·· - ···· ··- -----
> ----- ··--- -·· ··--··

U+002D is fine: it is already heavily overloaded, so why not impose onto it
the additional burden of representing the Morse dot. Cf. my previous note
discussing what's wrong with U+2013.

Best wishes,
Otto Stolz

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "RE: The result of the plane 14 tag characters review."
Previous message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The result of the plane 14 tag characters review."
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Morse code"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Morse code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 18 2002 - 07:57:34 EST