Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts

From: John Cowan (cowan@mercury.ccil.org)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 08:16:00 EDT

  • Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""

    William Overington scripsit:

    > >That said I'm ceratinly keen to avert a flame war,
    >
    > That is three people in two different threads who have mentioned the phrase
    > "flame war" recently. What exactly is a flame war?

    From the Jargon File (http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon):

    flame war n. [common] (var. `flamewar') An acrimonious dispute,
    especially when conducted on a public electronic forum such as Usenet.

    flame [MIT, orig. from the phrase `flaming asshole'] 1. vi. To post an
    email message intended to insult and provoke. 2. vi. To speak incessantly
    and/or rabidly on some relatively uninteresting subject or with a
    patently ridiculous attitude. 3. vt. Either of senses 1 or 2, directed
    with hostility at a particular person or people. 4. n. An instance of
    flaming. When a discussion degenerates into useless controversy, one
    might tell the participants "Now you're just flaming" or "Stop all that
    flamage!" to try to get them to cool down (so to speak).

    -- 
    John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          jcowan@reutershealth.com
    Please leave your values                Check your assumptions.  In fact,
       at the front desk.                      check your assumptions at the door.
         --sign in Paris hotel                   --Cordelia Vorkosigan
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 09:05:26 EDT