Unicode Mail List Archive
By Author

New Message 891 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ mail a new topic ]

Starting: Thu May 01 2003 - 08:52:41 EDT
Ending: Sat May 31 2003 - 18:50:41 EDT

• Abdij Bhat
  • RE: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:33:42 EDT)
  • RE: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:39:24 EDT)
  • CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 02:55:35 EDT)
• Adam Twardoch
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 10:43:43 EDT)
• Addison Phillips [wM]
  • RE: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 14:49:16 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 11:00:42 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Mon May 05 2003 - 14:06:42 EDT)
  • Re: Implementing on UTF8: toUpper(), toFold(), normalisation, collation, etc (Sat May 03 2003 - 12:45:25 EDT)
• akbar pasha
  • unsubscribe (Sat May 10 2003 - 01:47:44 EDT)
• Allen Haaheim
  • More on Zhong (but not Unicode) [totally OT now] (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?) (Mon May 19 2003 - 21:54:02 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 19:00:30 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 19:04:19 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 20:59:36 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Sun May 18 2003 - 20:55:15 EDT)
  • Re: John's Own Version of Unicode Conformance, Version 4.0 (Sat May 17 2003 - 06:13:34 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 18:36:49 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 18:30:10 EDT)
• Alok Kumar
  • RE: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:34:37 EDT)
• Andrew C. West
  • Radical Property (was �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages?) (Fri May 30 2003 - 05:42:23 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:31:28 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 04:42:08 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 12:50:03 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 09:22:10 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 04:50:13 EDT)
  • IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 07:18:00 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 08:09:36 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 17:58:58 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 13:13:44 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 12:47:13 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Mon May 19 2003 - 10:15:29 EDT)
  • Re: John's Own Version of Unicode Conformance, Version 4.0 (Mon May 19 2003 - 05:21:12 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 05:08:25 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Sat May 17 2003 - 06:33:25 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Sat May 17 2003 - 04:58:39 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 11:14:05 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 06:50:37 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Wed May 14 2003 - 06:01:38 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 12:23:15 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:58:11 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Tue May 13 2003 - 07:49:43 EDT)
• Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
  • U+1D29 (Thu May 29 2003 - 14:15:23 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 11:03:49 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] multilingual support in MS products (Sun May 11 2003 - 04:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: U+006E U+0308 spotted in the wild (Tue May 06 2003 - 10:14:30 EDT)
  • Dot shapes varying fontwise (was: "Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog") (Tue May 06 2003 - 09:59:33 EDT)
  • U+006E U+0308 spotted in the wild (Fri May 02 2003 - 13:47:04 EDT)
• Asmus Freytag
  • Re: U+1D29 (Thu May 29 2003 - 19:24:14 EDT)
  • Re: Maths letters and digits (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Fri May 23 2003 - 00:57:29 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 00:52:22 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 00:25:18 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 17:03:14 EDT)
  • Re: Dania in Unicode? (Thu May 15 2003 - 17:13:39 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:14:00 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:30:41 EDT)
• Ben Dougall
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 18:19:12 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:12:30 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:12:59 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Thu May 29 2003 - 16:47:50 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 16:53:54 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 07:55:35 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 07:52:09 EDT)
  • �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Wed May 28 2003 - 08:39:50 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 10:56:22 EDT)
  • Re: More of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 available online (Thu May 22 2003 - 07:33:30 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Sat May 17 2003 - 07:47:03 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Fri May 16 2003 - 19:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Fri May 16 2003 - 17:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Fri May 16 2003 - 12:38:21 EDT)
  • character groupings in various languages (Thu May 15 2003 - 18:03:07 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 18:20:26 EDT)
  • 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 16:29:09 EDT)
  • 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 16:35:03 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:36:04 EDT)
  • Re: encoding checker (Tue May 13 2003 - 08:19:29 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 15:16:44 EDT)
  • suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:50:16 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 09:10:25 EDT)
  • suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 05:56:08 EDT)
  • Re: Implementing on UTF8: toUpper(), toFold(), normalisation, collation, etc (Sat May 03 2003 - 13:54:57 EDT)
  • Re: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 08:38:34 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 18:07:26 EDT)
• Ben Monroe
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 06:52:08 EDT)
• Bertrand Laidain
  • Re: Hebrew "aposthophe" (Mon May 19 2003 - 05:36:46 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • RE: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 08:30:27 EDT)
• Brian Doyle
  • FW: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:37:31 EDT)
  • Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:50:21 EDT)
• Brian Jones
  • unsubscribe (Wed May 14 2003 - 00:51:50 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (Thu May 22 2003 - 13:53:50 EDT)
• Carl W. Brown
  • RE: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 14:48:17 EDT)
  • RE: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:29:38 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:28:45 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:35:34 EDT)
  • RE: [OT] Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 20:10:23 EDT)
  • RE: Implementing on UTF8: toUpper(), toFold(), normalisation, collation, etc (Sat May 03 2003 - 13:32:52 EDT)
• Chris Jacobs
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 12:17:10 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 09:36:38 EDT)
• Christopher John Fynn
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 15:48:20 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 12:48:34 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 08:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 15:30:26 EDT)
  • Re: "default ignorable" posts (Wed May 28 2003 - 10:12:09 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 10:25:27 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Thu May 22 2003 - 03:36:20 EDT)
  • Re: On BBC2 tonight at 23:20 GMT (Tue May 13 2003 - 22:10:24 EDT)
  • Re: Private Use Area (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 11:52:38 EDT)
• Christopher Vance
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 19:48:35 EDT)
• Curtis Clark
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 12:08:29 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 12:11:08 EDT)
  • Re: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 21:58:22 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:35:59 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:13:15 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:05:28 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Mon May 05 2003 - 00:44:21 EDT)
• Dan Kogai
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 15:57:53 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 15:16:52 EDT)
• David Starner
  • Re: Fw: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 03:21:01 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 20:33:53 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 20:24:59 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:39:53 EDT)
  • Re: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 13:19:40 EDT)
• Dean Snyder
  • ICE2 (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:14:02 EDT)
• Deborah Goldsmith
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Thu May 15 2003 - 14:11:25 EDT)
  • Decimal separator with more than one character? (Wed May 14 2003 - 17:21:06 EDT)
• Deborah W. Anderson
  • Script Encoding Initiative: Updated pages (Wed May 07 2003 - 13:16:51 EDT)
• djinn
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Thu May 08 2003 - 22:11:18 EDT)
• Dominikus Scherkl
  • RE: Characters as requested plus some more (Fri May 23 2003 - 10:52:22 EDT)
• Don Osborn
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Fri May 16 2003 - 17:48:19 EDT)
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Wed May 14 2003 - 01:05:18 EDT)
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Tue May 13 2003 - 15:10:56 EDT)
  • Sources for characters in ISO 6438 (Mon May 12 2003 - 17:26:02 EDT)
  • Hooked-y's in Unicode 4.0 (Sun May 11 2003 - 05:16:48 EDT)
• Doug Ewell
  • Use of Savvy logo with PUA characters (was: Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:44:56 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 22:53:32 EDT)
  • Criteria for displaying Savvy logo (was: Re: Not snazzy) (Wed May 28 2003 - 18:27:53 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 12:45:50 EDT)
  • Re: “book end” or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:09:45 EDT)
  • Re: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Wed May 28 2003 - 03:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: Web Form: Problems - Hebrew in Java applet (Wed May 28 2003 - 01:26:46 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 22:40:16 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 19:49:09 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Sun May 25 2003 - 21:38:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 21:08:24 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 18:04:58 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:22:28 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Fri May 23 2003 - 00:05:16 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 11:57:02 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 11:55:19 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Sat May 17 2003 - 19:17:07 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Sat May 17 2003 - 18:44:46 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Sat May 17 2003 - 17:09:15 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Fri May 16 2003 - 10:14:09 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Fri May 16 2003 - 03:11:22 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Fri May 16 2003 - 02:57:46 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 02:23:02 EDT)
  • Re: Klingon, again (Wed May 14 2003 - 00:40:02 EDT)
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Wed May 14 2003 - 00:57:14 EDT)
  • Re: EBCDIC code pages (Sun May 11 2003 - 21:00:56 EDT)
  • LTag returns (Sat May 03 2003 - 16:02:45 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Sat May 03 2003 - 12:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:22:38 EDT)
• Edward C. D. Hopkins
  • BabelMap (Fri May 30 2003 - 12:25:25 EDT)
  • Re: Aramaic Roadmap (was: Persian or Farsi?) (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:36:11 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Thu May 22 2003 - 12:18:24 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 23:28:39 EDT)
  • [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 08:29:11 EDT)
• Edward H Trager
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:41:31 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:54:49 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 17:26:30 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 14:16:03 EDT)
  • Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 12:29:16 EDT)
  • Re: encoding checker (Tue May 13 2003 - 12:31:09 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 12:13:32 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 11:18:52 EDT)
• Eric Muller
  • Re: U+1D29 (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:30:59 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 11:45:58 EDT)
• Eugene Mandel
  • Re: weird UTF-8 encoding in MS Exchange 2000 IM client (Thu May 15 2003 - 16:41:37 EDT)
  • weird UTF-8 encoding in MS Exchange 2000 IM client (Thu May 15 2003 - 01:22:35 EDT)
• Figge, Donald
  • RE: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:47:02 EDT)
  • RE: Dot shapes varying fontwise (was: "Re: The quick brown fox ju mps over the lazy dog") (Tue May 06 2003 - 14:09:04 EDT)
• Francois Yergeau
  • RE: [Not OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:22:56 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:04:52 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 14:35:08 EDT)
  • RE: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 12:45:01 EDT)
  • RE: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:37:53 EDT)
  • RE: NFC Normalization of whitespace+nonspacing combining in XML (Wed May 21 2003 - 14:37:30 EDT)
• Frank da Cruz
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:32:23 EDT)
• Gary P. Grosso
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 16:16:07 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 16:19:17 EDT)
  • how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 09:52:05 EDT)
• J Do
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:19:47 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:26:07 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 10:34:45 EDT)
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • Re: More of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 available online (Thu May 22 2003 - 13:13:30 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:58:03 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Mon May 12 2003 - 16:44:14 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:01:54 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Sun May 04 2003 - 23:05:11 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode in browser (Fri May 02 2003 - 03:31:50 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode in browser (Fri May 02 2003 - 03:23:35 EDT)
• Jane Liu
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:25:29 EDT)
  • Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Wed May 28 2003 - 15:36:39 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 03:53:43 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 03:52:34 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Fri May 30 2003 - 03:35:24 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Wed May 28 2003 - 03:48:19 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 04:01:03 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:10:25 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 08:32:08 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Thu May 15 2003 - 10:50:05 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Thu May 15 2003 - 01:37:13 EDT)
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 09:27:49 EDT)
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 08:08:00 EDT)
• Jim Allan
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Sat May 31 2003 - 00:30:16 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 14:05:43 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:38:12 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Wed May 28 2003 - 20:44:40 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 18:00:59 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 10:06:19 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 10:06:19 EDT)
  • Re: Weighting ae and oe (was the unbelievably wandering Re: Decimal separator...) (Tue May 20 2003 - 01:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 19:48:51 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Sat May 17 2003 - 18:06:24 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ character (Thu May 01 2003 - 18:12:35 EDT)
  • RE: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 18:09:05 EDT)
• John Clews
  • ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Tue May 13 2003 - 04:41:27 EDT)
• John Cowan
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:44:27 EDT)
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:40:37 EDT)
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 12:25:53 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:07:13 EDT)
  • Re: [Not OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Thu May 29 2003 - 22:25:50 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:25:43 EDT)
  • Re: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:47:04 EDT)
  • Re: ?book end? or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:52:38 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:47:07 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:06:12 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:07:49 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:32:32 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 12:49:34 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 08:02:13 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 13:20:03 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 12:40:24 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 11:08:16 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 11:12:11 EDT)
  • Re: marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish (Thu May 22 2003 - 08:45:25 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 08:04:41 EDT)
  • Re: Norms of written English (was... was... was...) (Wed May 21 2003 - 21:49:52 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Export laws in USA and elsewhere (was RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?)) (Wed May 21 2003 - 15:47:20 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 17:36:18 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 21:19:07 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 10:59:35 EDT)
  • "Yankee" (Sat May 17 2003 - 23:20:17 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 23:13:25 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 23:04:46 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 12:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: John's Own Version of Unicode Conformance, Version 4.0 (Fri May 16 2003 - 23:40:04 EDT)
  • John's Own Version of Unicode Conformance, Version 4.0 (Fri May 16 2003 - 21:48:46 EDT)
  • Re: Klingon, again (Fri May 16 2003 - 07:37:56 EDT)
  • Possible Neolithic writing in China (Wed May 14 2003 - 15:52:51 EDT)
  • EBCDIC code pages (Sat May 10 2003 - 12:44:05 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 12:14:06 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:00:32 EDT)
  • ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Thu May 08 2003 - 15:32:40 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 11:34:06 EDT)
  • Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Thu May 08 2003 - 08:16:00 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:56:13 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:17:31 EDT)
  • Re: Dot shapes varying fontwise (was: "Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog") (Tue May 06 2003 - 14:41:04 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 10:46:25 EDT)
  • Re: U+006E U+0308 spotted in the wild (Fri May 02 2003 - 16:11:45 EDT)
• John Delacour
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 07:46:44 EDT)
• John Hudson
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 01:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 20:22:51 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 14:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Mon May 26 2003 - 13:47:49 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 20:38:43 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 16:29:28 EDT)
  • Who's who (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:23:14 EDT)
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Wed May 14 2003 - 13:07:25 EDT)
  • Re: [off topic] Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 15:42:29 EDT)
  • Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:17:57 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:21:19 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:59:14 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:57:21 EDT)
  • Re: Discussing fonts (was: Quest text font now available) (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:24:25 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 13:29:24 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Tue May 06 2003 - 14:43:00 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:49:12 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Sat May 03 2003 - 14:29:43 EDT)
  • RE: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 16:23:14 EDT)
• John Jenkins
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 16:48:55 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 10:48:42 EDT)
• Jonathan Coxhead
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 15:25:23 EDT)
• Jungshik Shin
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sat May 17 2003 - 21:48:51 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 16 2003 - 23:03:35 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 16 2003 - 21:24:19 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:41:33 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:33:31 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Mon May 12 2003 - 04:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Mon May 12 2003 - 04:08:27 EDT)
  • visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 06:18:52 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sat May 10 2003 - 22:22:27 EDT)
  • RE: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 22:04:39 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 09:42:22 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 09:31:01 EDT)
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp" (Fri May 09 2003 - 08:33:11 EDT)
  • RE: Question ... (Fri May 09 2003 - 08:10:24 EDT)
  • visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 06:18:52 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 08:51:28 EDT)
• Karl Pentzlin
  • Re: Fw: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 15:01:55 EDT)
  • Re: Fw: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 06:49:07 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Sat May 31 2003 - 06:17:46 EDT)
  • Re: U+1D29 (Thu May 29 2003 - 20:22:22 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 18:42:19 EDT)
  • When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Wed May 28 2003 - 15:59:54 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 07:04:34 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 14:29:55 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 18:02:57 EDT)
  • Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 06:19:32 EDT)
• Karlj�rgen Feuerherm
  • Re: OutlookExpress (Sun May 25 2003 - 14:26:56 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:35:38 EDT)
  • Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 08:51:34 EDT)
• Kazuhiro Kazama
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Thu May 29 2003 - 13:02:10 EDT)
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Thu May 29 2003 - 07:56:56 EDT)
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:10:17 EDT)
• Kenneth Whistler
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 21:53:02 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 19:10:17 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 17:49:26 EDT)
  • Re: [Not OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Thu May 29 2003 - 20:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: "book end" or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 19:11:07 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 19:05:37 EDT)
  • Re: U+1D29 (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:56:25 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 16:35:13 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 22:47:34 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 20:57:43 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Tue May 27 2003 - 18:37:56 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 22:36:00 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Fri May 23 2003 - 21:46:19 EDT)
  • RE: Characters as requested plus some more (Fri May 23 2003 - 19:28:00 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 21:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 21:13:35 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:07:26 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 18:42:09 EDT)
  • Norms of written English (was... was... was...) (Wed May 21 2003 - 18:15:42 EDT)
  • More of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 available online (Wed May 21 2003 - 15:45:57 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 20:58:38 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:01:17 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 16:11:04 EDT)
  • Weighting ae and oe (was the unbelievably wandering Re: Decimal separator...) (Mon May 19 2003 - 21:01:00 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Fri May 16 2003 - 20:18:18 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:33:45 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:09:46 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Fri May 16 2003 - 14:58:49 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Wed May 14 2003 - 19:41:41 EDT)
  • RE: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 18:45:07 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 17:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: U+3031 and on (Mon May 12 2003 - 17:51:58 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 20:18:13 EDT)
  • Re: The word "normative", and more terminology beginner problems (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:49:01 EDT)
  • Re: unihan.txt (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:17:49 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:00:54 EDT)
  • RE: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 19:38:03 EDT)
  • RE: character "stories" (Mon May 05 2003 - 15:51:28 EDT)
  • RE: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 16:02:31 EDT)
• Kent Karlsson
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 12:22:43 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:01:22 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:43:04 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:19:23 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:19:01 EDT)
  • RE: Dutch IJ, again (Wed May 28 2003 - 16:49:41 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Wed May 28 2003 - 16:50:48 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Wed May 28 2003 - 16:51:11 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 06:27:35 EDT)
  • RE: character "stories" (Tue May 06 2003 - 04:54:24 EDT)
  • RE: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 06:54:36 EDT)
  • RE: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 08:35:26 EDT)
• Kevin Brown
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 22:15:07 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available (Thu May 08 2003 - 02:48:01 EDT)
• Libin Xie
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 19:24:11 EDT)
  • Simplified Chinese sort sequence in Unicode? (Sun May 11 2003 - 23:14:09 EDT)
• Lukas Pietsch
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 16:30:22 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 03:46:18 EDT)
• Magda Danish \(Unicode\)
  • FW: Web Form: Problems - Hebrew in Java applet (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:46:04 EDT)
  • Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Tue May 27 2003 - 16:49:24 EDT)
  • FW: Visual FoxPro: Mixing Engish & Kanji in a database (Tue May 13 2003 - 21:01:29 EDT)
• Marco Cimarosti
  • PUA usage (was RE: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:52:35 EDT)
  • PUA usage (was RE: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:55:06 EDT)
  • RE: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:19:36 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 06:12:38 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 10:24:58 EDT)
  • RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 07:21:13 EDT)
  • RE: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 06:07:53 EDT)
  • RE: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental language s? (Thu May 22 2003 - 08:46:34 EDT)
  • RE: More of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 available online (Thu May 22 2003 - 05:00:19 EDT)
  • [OT] Export laws in USA and elsewhere (was RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?)) (Wed May 21 2003 - 08:50:36 EDT)
  • Hebrew "aposthophe" (Tue May 20 2003 - 05:03:37 EDT)
  • [totally OT now] Zhong (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?) (Mon May 19 2003 - 15:51:14 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 14:43:23 EDT)
  • FW: Malayalam Cillaksharams (was Ya-phalaa) (Mon May 19 2003 - 12:43:01 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 12:36:14 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 12:13:49 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 12:22:00 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 13:26:40 EDT)
  • RE: Collator tool (Fri May 16 2003 - 11:42:02 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 15:17:00 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 10:25:31 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Thu May 15 2003 - 10:19:19 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 09:00:09 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 07:54:54 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 05:43:31 EDT)
  • RE: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Thu May 15 2003 - 05:20:26 EDT)
  • RE: Question ... (Fri May 09 2003 - 08:01:45 EDT)
  • RE: Question ... (Fri May 09 2003 - 06:17:04 EDT)
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 12:19:39 EDT)
  • RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 10:08:52 EDT)
  • RE: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Wed May 07 2003 - 08:35:42 EDT)
  • RE: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Mon May 05 2003 - 12:28:10 EDT)
  • RE: character "stories" (Mon May 05 2003 - 11:51:09 EDT)
  • RE: U+006E U+0308 spotted in the wild (Mon May 05 2003 - 06:35:18 EDT)
  • RE: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 06:14:23 EDT)
• Marion Gunn
  • Re: Language Tag Registrations (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:52:01 EDT)
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:22:12 EDT)
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:00:22 EDT)
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 12:55:25 EDT)
  • Re: FW: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Sat May 31 2003 - 11:52:51 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Sat May 31 2003 - 11:48:55 EDT)
  • RE: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:15:26 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 17:04:42 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 14:25:41 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 10:37:41 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 10:46:07 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:33:35 EDT)
  • RE: OS X 10.2.4: erroneous language tagging (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:03:26 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Sun May 04 2003 - 20:00:37 EDT)
• Mark Davis
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 21:48:40 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode 4.0 in ICU demos (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:04:30 EDT)
  • Re: javascript and unicode (Tue May 27 2003 - 18:18:24 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 13:45:01 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 11:13:34 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sun May 25 2003 - 15:57:12 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Mon May 19 2003 - 20:14:15 EDT)
  • Proposed Update: UTS #6: A Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode (Tue May 20 2003 - 13:05:07 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 12:26:59 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Mon May 19 2003 - 20:14:15 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Mon May 19 2003 - 18:52:24 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 16 2003 - 22:36:44 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 16 2003 - 19:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTR #18: Unicode Regular Expressions (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:54:07 EDT)
  • Proposed Update of UTR #18: Unicode Regular Expressions (Fri May 16 2003 - 00:26:52 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 18:24:13 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Tue May 13 2003 - 10:59:21 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Mon May 12 2003 - 16:52:03 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sun May 11 2003 - 14:04:23 EDT)
  • Filing requests (was Re: Hooked-y's in Unicode 4.0) (Sun May 11 2003 - 13:36:39 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 09 2003 - 23:28:49 EDT)
  • Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 09 2003 - 21:07:30 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 13:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 10:51:15 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 12:13:14 EDT)
• Markus Scherer
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 20:27:44 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 15:08:59 EDT)
  • Re: javascript and unicode (Tue May 27 2003 - 16:41:41 EDT)
  • Re: U+0F81 - Unicode 4.0 normalization error (missing exclusion for "Tibetan Vowel Sign Reversed II") (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:29:29 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:38:41 EDT)
  • Re: EBCDIC code pages (Mon May 12 2003 - 12:57:51 EDT)
  • Re: U+0F81 - Unicode 4.0 normalization error (missing exclusion for "Tibetan Vowel Sign Reversed II") (Mon May 12 2003 - 13:02:07 EDT)
  • Re: WCode (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:26:55 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:21:49 EDT)
  • Re: Query on setting UTF-8 as encoding in the context of WebSphere application server (Thu May 08 2003 - 20:32:37 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 12:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 14:55:07 EDT)
  • Re: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 11:36:56 EDT)
  • Re: C string literals with 16-bit Unicode (Fri May 02 2003 - 11:24:34 EDT)
  • Re: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:24:47 EDT)
• Maurice Bauhahn
  • RE: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 07:40:31 EDT)
  • Creating sample Unicode databases; escaped Unicode data in SQL (Thu May 01 2003 - 17:45:44 EDT)
• Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
  • VERY OT: OutlookExpress (Sun May 25 2003 - 15:06:42 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:58:53 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 23:10:01 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Export laws in USA and elsewhere (was RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?)) (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:41:55 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 06:50:54 EDT)
  • Re: John's Own Version of Unicode Conformance, Version 4.0 (Fri May 16 2003 - 22:19:37 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Thu May 15 2003 - 14:27:05 EDT)
  • Re: Simplified Chinese sort sequence in Unicode? (Sun May 11 2003 - 23:51:42 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Sun May 11 2003 - 14:40:13 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 09:20:51 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 10:26:08 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 09:07:21 EDT)
  • Re: variants and code-page --> unicode conversion (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:37:17 EDT)
  • Re: variants and code-page --> unicode conversion (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:34:06 EDT)
• Michael Everson
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 18:13:47 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 04:49:17 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:26:40 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:10:30 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:34:18 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:09:24 EDT)
  • RE: New contributions for WG2 (Wed May 28 2003 - 13:54:10 EDT)
  • New contributions for WG2 (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:22:23 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Wed May 28 2003 - 08:22:14 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 07:38:46 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:15:42 EDT)
  • 24 May (Sun May 25 2003 - 16:03:24 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (Sun May 25 2003 - 06:47:57 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Sat May 24 2003 - 20:32:31 EDT)
  • Re: Maths letters and digits (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:51:34 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:52:47 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (Thu May 22 2003 - 15:21:17 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 14:07:08 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Thu May 22 2003 - 14:00:11 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Thu May 22 2003 - 13:58:52 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 17:50:59 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 08:07:02 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 04:29:16 EDT)
  • Characters as requested plus some more (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:37:09 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:01:32 EDT)
  • Persian and Farsi (Mon May 19 2003 - 08:19:50 EDT)
  • Re: Dania in Unicode? (Thu May 15 2003 - 16:44:22 EDT)
  • Re: On BBC2 tonight at 23:20 GMT (Wed May 14 2003 - 06:53:33 EDT)
  • Klingon, again (Tue May 13 2003 - 20:04:34 EDT)
  • On BBC2 tonight at 23:20 GMT (Tue May 13 2003 - 17:07:54 EDT)
  • New Old Persian document - N2583 (Sun May 11 2003 - 14:25:36 EDT)
  • Good news, if true, about the Baghdad Museum (Sat May 10 2003 - 10:49:41 EDT)
  • Good news, if true, about the Baghdad Museum (Sat May 10 2003 - 10:49:41 EDT)
  • Re: ICE2 (Fri May 09 2003 - 15:37:33 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 13:04:07 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:19:33 EDT)
  • Re: Discussing fonts (was: Quest text font now available) (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:11:27 EDT)
  • RE: Press Release: Afghan language (Wed May 07 2003 - 13:24:25 EDT)
  • Re: Press Release: Afghan language (Wed May 07 2003 - 11:19:16 EDT)
  • Re: Press Release: Afghan language (Wed May 07 2003 - 10:57:35 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Wed May 07 2003 - 08:18:29 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Tue May 06 2003 - 07:28:23 EDT)
  • Re: OS X 10.2.4 (an dea-sc�ala ) (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:14:04 EDT)
  • Press Release: Afghan language (Mon May 05 2003 - 17:51:33 EDT)
  • Re: character "stories" (Mon May 05 2003 - 08:08:41 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Mon May 05 2003 - 04:59:42 EDT)
  • Re: cuatrillo and tresillo (Fri May 02 2003 - 04:53:27 EDT)
  • Re: cuatrillo and tresillo (Thu May 01 2003 - 14:51:50 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 15:03:19 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:17:04 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 10:44:09 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri May 09 2003 - 22:54:26 EDT)
• N. R. Liwal
  • Re: Press Release: Afghan language (Thu May 08 2003 - 02:13:40 EDT)
  • Re: Press Release: Afghan language (Wed May 07 2003 - 09:15:28 EDT)
• Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text ... (Sat May 10 2003 - 08:30:21 EDT)
• Noah Levitt
  • Re: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:13:15 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:02:54 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 19:02:12 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 15:39:13 EDT)
• Ostermueller, Erik
  • variants and code-page --> unicode conversion (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:01:37 EDT)
• Otto Stolz
  • Specifying the character encoding (was: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Fri May 30 2003 - 14:30:57 EDT)
  • Re: Re: “book end” or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Wed May 28 2003 - 13:59:42 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Mon May 19 2003 - 06:26:48 EDT)
  • 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Thu May 15 2003 - 12:43:56 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Thu May 15 2003 - 12:29:59 EDT)
  • Re: EBCDIC code pages (Mon May 12 2003 - 05:28:12 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 04:25:15 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode in browser (Tue May 06 2003 - 09:13:33 EDT)
• Patrick Andries
  • Re: Rare extinct latin letters (Fri May 30 2003 - 13:23:49 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:36:27 EDT)
  • Re: [Not OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Thu May 29 2003 - 20:29:20 EDT)
  • Rare extinct latin letters (Thu May 29 2003 - 19:15:10 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Thu May 29 2003 - 18:04:33 EDT)
• Paul Hastings
  • javascript and unicode (Thu May 22 2003 - 11:55:13 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • Fw: Unicode filename problems (Fri May 30 2003 - 23:58:53 EDT)
  • Re: Rare extinct latin letters (Fri May 30 2003 - 09:11:31 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 09:08:39 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 09:02:18 EDT)
  • Re: FW: The role of country codes/Not snazzy (Thu May 29 2003 - 14:56:09 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 14:40:45 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:53:43 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:57:17 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Thu May 29 2003 - 05:38:49 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:18:29 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:23:57 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:12:20 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 13:55:57 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 13:51:44 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:50:33 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:47:46 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 13:38:13 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 13:38:14 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 07:48:42 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Mon May 26 2003 - 11:58:46 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Mon May 26 2003 - 10:56:01 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 09:42:54 EDT)
  • Re: "default ignorable" posts (was Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficientfor Oriental languages?) (Mon May 26 2003 - 09:14:04 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient forOriental languages?) (Mon May 26 2003 - 09:18:35 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (Sat May 24 2003 - 14:19:00 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:15:21 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:55:07 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:46:22 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:07:11 EDT)
  • "default ignorable" posts (was Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:09:14 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:35:39 EDT)
  • RE: marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish (Thu May 22 2003 - 09:57:42 EDT)
  • marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:06:24 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Thu May 22 2003 - 05:39:46 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:56:44 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:59:53 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:37:49 EDT)
  • Re: Hebrew "aposthophe" (Tue May 20 2003 - 07:36:39 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 11:52:58 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:48:51 EDT)
  • Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1 (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:35:46 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:48:23 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:43:24 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Fri May 16 2003 - 11:19:05 EDT)
  • Re: Good news, if true, about the Baghdad Museum (Mon May 12 2003 - 09:17:19 EDT)
  • representation of digraphs (Fri May 09 2003 - 23:08:31 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 22:37:14 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:26:28 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:18:09 EDT)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Fri May 09 2003 - 01:39:06 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 14:11:00 EDT)
  • Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Thu May 08 2003 - 12:08:10 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 11:54:44 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 12:01:43 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 11:44:39 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 11:20:10 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 11:32:08 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Wed May 07 2003 - 11:25:54 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:06:09 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 11:38:06 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 10:38:49 EDT)
  • Re: cuatrillo and tresillo (Fri May 02 2003 - 12:35:11 EDT)
  • Re: cuatrillo and tresillo (Thu May 01 2003 - 19:29:06 EDT)
  • cuatrillo and tresillo (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:58:06 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:16:41 EDT)
  • Re: Private Use Area (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:13:54 EDT)
  • bug in Excel version of UCD (Thu May 01 2003 - 09:18:32 EDT)
• Philippe Verdy
  • Re: Language Tag Registrations (Sat May 31 2003 - 18:42:39 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 18:12:16 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Sat May 31 2003 - 14:15:37 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 10:01:02 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Sat May 31 2003 - 03:46:56 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 19:47:14 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 16:08:43 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:08:38 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:57:45 EDT)
  • Re: Rare extinct latin letters (Fri May 30 2003 - 10:42:53 EDT)
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 06:21:58 EDT)
  • Re: Rare extinct latin letters (Thu May 29 2003 - 21:37:41 EDT)
  • Re: [Not OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Thu May 29 2003 - 20:00:50 EDT)
  • Re: "book end" or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 18:11:30 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:51:20 EDT)
  • Re: Emailing logos to the list (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:27:27 EDT)
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:11:05 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:33:44 EDT)
  • Re: �book end� or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:10:02 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:46:11 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode 4.0 in ICU demos (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:23:22 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 07:12:42 EDT)
  • Re: More savvy logos (Thu May 29 2003 - 06:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Thu May 29 2003 - 06:56:58 EDT)
  • Re: More savvy logos (Thu May 29 2003 - 06:31:02 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 06:11:55 EDT)
  • Re: Shift-JIS/Unicode mapping in JAVA (Wed May 28 2003 - 21:35:11 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 21:18:00 EDT)
  • Re: When do you use U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER instead of U+002E FULL STOP? (Wed May 28 2003 - 21:13:41 EDT)
  • More savvy logos (Wed May 28 2003 - 21:02:25 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 09:32:46 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 08:56:47 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Wed May 28 2003 - 07:19:50 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Tue May 27 2003 - 18:20:38 EDT)
  • Re: javascript and unicode (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:49:14 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:09:09 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 16:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 16:59:52 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 12:50:39 EDT)
  • Re: [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Tue May 27 2003 - 08:01:08 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 19:45:53 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:17:49 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:05:57 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:09:13 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 13:02:34 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 12:33:51 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sun May 25 2003 - 05:30:44 EDT)
  • [OT] Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:17:54 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:23:29 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:00:36 EDT)
  • PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 09:23:53 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 08:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Sat May 24 2003 - 05:13:25 EDT)
  • [OT for Asmus Freytag only] Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 10:41:27 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 09:41:26 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 07:35:50 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:23:31 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 19:02:54 EDT)
  • Maths letters and digits (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?) (Thu May 22 2003 - 18:33:00 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 17:46:42 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 17:00:22 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 13:42:31 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 11:08:40 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 07:15:28 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:31:22 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:06:28 EDT)
  • Re: Norms of written English (was... was... was...) (Wed May 21 2003 - 19:24:10 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Export laws in USA and elsewhere (was RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?)) (Wed May 21 2003 - 11:00:29 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 10:49:27 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:25:52 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 09:31:59 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 19:27:24 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:50:39 EDT)
  • NFC Normalization of whitespace+nonspacing combining in XML (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:28:11 EDT)
  • Fw: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 17:22:16 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 14:40:44 EDT)
  • Re: Computing default UCA collation tables (Tue May 20 2003 - 10:55:23 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 06:56:56 EDT)
  • Re: character groupings in various languages (Mon May 19 2003 - 00:25:53 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Sat May 17 2003 - 21:54:54 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sat May 17 2003 - 20:05:02 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sat May 17 2003 - 19:03:52 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 18:50:13 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 14:29:19 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Sat May 17 2003 - 13:53:25 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Sat May 17 2003 - 13:04:55 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Sat May 17 2003 - 07:51:29 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Thu May 15 2003 - 18:15:08 EDT)
  • Fw: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Thu May 15 2003 - 16:10:34 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Thu May 15 2003 - 13:56:44 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Thu May 15 2003 - 13:48:13 EDT)
  • Proposing NCC and NCD (Normalized Collation (De)Composition) forms aligned with UCA (Thu May 15 2003 - 11:52:55 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Thu May 15 2003 - 12:08:19 EDT)
  • Computing default UCA collation tables (Thu May 15 2003 - 05:36:05 EDT)
  • Re: U+0F81 - Unicode 4.0 normalization error (missing exclusion for "Tibetan Vowel Sign Reversed II") (Tue May 13 2003 - 05:58:59 EDT)
  • Re: U+0F81 - Unicode 4.0 normalization error (missing exclusion for "Tibetan Vowel Sign Reversed II") (Mon May 12 2003 - 09:53:03 EDT)
• Pim Blokland
  • Re: “book end” or <enclosing characters> in most languages? (Thu May 29 2003 - 09:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Wed May 28 2003 - 10:41:34 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Wed May 28 2003 - 05:45:19 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Tue May 27 2003 - 09:48:50 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 16:00:39 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 10:13:42 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:08:05 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:11:20 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Sat May 24 2003 - 10:11:08 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Sat May 17 2003 - 09:29:39 EDT)
  • Re: weird UTF-8 encoding in MS Exchange 2000 IM client (Thu May 15 2003 - 05:47:11 EDT)
  • Re: how to sort by stroke (not radical/stroke) (Tue May 13 2003 - 17:27:53 EDT)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:42:20 EDT)
  • Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters (Fri May 09 2003 - 07:50:22 EDT)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:42:20 EDT)
  • Discussing fonts (was: Quest text font now available) (Wed May 07 2003 - 13:42:33 EDT)
  • Re: character "stories" (Tue May 06 2003 - 08:45:01 EDT)
  • Re: character "stories" (Tue May 06 2003 - 08:43:44 EDT)
  • Re: character "stories" (Mon May 05 2003 - 07:52:48 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode in browser (Fri May 02 2003 - 03:56:54 EDT)
  • Re: Accented IJ (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:16:59 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 11:21:13 EDT)
• Ram Viswanadha
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 10:41:56 EDT)
• Raymond Mercier
  • Re: Fw: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 17:08:17 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:21:16 EDT)
  • Re: Fw: Unicode filename problems (Sat May 31 2003 - 07:18:13 EDT)
  • RE: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:00:05 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Fri May 23 2003 - 03:29:16 EDT)
  • OCR for Chinese (Sun May 18 2003 - 12:41:45 EDT)
  • Re: unihan.txt (Wed May 07 2003 - 16:18:15 EDT)
  • unihan.txt (Wed May 07 2003 - 10:13:48 EDT)
  • Re: Sorting fonts by unicode (Fri May 02 2003 - 12:57:52 EDT)
  • Re: Sorting fonts by unicode (Fri May 02 2003 - 07:42:19 EDT)
  • Re: Sorting fonts by unicode (Fri May 02 2003 - 01:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: Sorting fonts by unicode (Thu May 01 2003 - 17:13:54 EDT)
  • Sorting fonts by unicode (Thu May 01 2003 - 16:11:28 EDT)
• Rick Cameron
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sun May 25 2003 - 02:24:47 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Thu May 22 2003 - 12:52:44 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 12:34:47 EDT)
  • Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Tue May 20 2003 - 18:58:53 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 14:49:22 EDT)
  • RE: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Wed May 14 2003 - 17:48:54 EDT)
• Rick McGowan
  • Re: "my browser ... puts up a box" (Sat May 31 2003 - 13:57:32 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 18:08:44 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:02:06 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 20:36:24 EDT)
  • Re: CodePage Information (Thu May 22 2003 - 11:20:26 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 12:49:32 EDT)
  • Open public review items... (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:05:10 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Wed May 14 2003 - 19:19:14 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Wed May 14 2003 - 19:15:54 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text in potentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 12:03:44 EDT)
  • Re: suggestions for strategy on dealing with plain text inpotentially any (unspecified) encoding? (Sat May 10 2003 - 12:05:32 EDT)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Essentialist Explanations, 9.0th edition (Thu May 08 2003 - 17:12:27 EDT)
  • Re: unihan.txt (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:16:59 EDT)
  • ICE Conference, June 5-7 2003 (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:01:38 EDT)
  • Re: Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 13:11:08 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 12:22:29 EDT)
• Roozbeh Pournader
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 31 2003 - 11:00:25 EDT)
  • Unicode and Iranian Blogs (Sat May 31 2003 - 10:32:11 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode 4.0 in ICU demos (Thu May 29 2003 - 07:30:52 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sun May 25 2003 - 07:38:48 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (Sun May 25 2003 - 07:30:00 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:12:36 EDT)
  • RE: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 08:27:50 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 08:33:59 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one character?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 10:18:29 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 10:24:18 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 10:08:32 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Wed May 21 2003 - 10:15:59 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Wed May 21 2003 - 05:54:53 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than one c haracter?) (Wed May 21 2003 - 06:04:46 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 11:49:08 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 05:40:40 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 04:46:39 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sat May 17 2003 - 02:26:16 EDT)
  • Re: Press Release: Afghan language (Wed May 07 2003 - 10:16:25 EDT)
• Sarasvati
  • Summer mail (Wed May 28 2003 - 12:56:50 EDT)
  • Re: [Unicode] Suggestion to list owner (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:27:41 EDT)
• Sayamindu Dasgupta
  • [Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters (Mon May 26 2003 - 09:06:06 EDT)
• Sebastian Hofer
  • [SUM] encoding checker (Wed May 14 2003 - 04:19:49 EDT)
  • encoding checker (Tue May 13 2003 - 04:31:48 EDT)
• Shaun Dippnall
  • Question ... (Fri May 09 2003 - 04:23:59 EDT)
• souravm
  • Query on setting UTF-8 as encoding in the context of WebSphere application server (Wed May 07 2003 - 21:09:22 EDT)
• SRIDHARAN Aravind
  • Displaying unicode in browser (Fri May 02 2003 - 01:41:28 EDT)
• Stefan Persson
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 10:45:47 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 17:14:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 12:11:09 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:56:55 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode-compliant email manager on XP system (Sat May 24 2003 - 11:11:11 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 09:23:47 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Tue May 20 2003 - 05:49:51 EDT)
  • Re: 8-bit encodings and ASCII (was: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii) (Sat May 17 2003 - 04:15:26 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Fri May 16 2003 - 14:24:35 EDT)
  • U+3031 and on (Sat May 10 2003 - 11:44:05 EDT)
  • Re: variants and code-page --> unicode conversion (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:30:52 EDT)
  • Normalisation question (Fri May 02 2003 - 04:40:08 EDT)
• Tay, William
  • Collator tool (Fri May 16 2003 - 10:53:19 EDT)
• Tex Texin
  • Re: OT: Website hijacking (Mon May 19 2003 - 10:04:28 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Sun May 18 2003 - 19:53:58 EDT)
  • OT: Website hijacking (Sun May 18 2003 - 20:05:14 EDT)
• Theodore H. Smith
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:50:45 EDT)
  • Emailing logos to the list (Thu May 29 2003 - 08:54:50 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 13:38:25 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 08:22:17 EDT)
  • Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 13:29:43 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 08:51:10 EDT)
  • Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:47:50 EDT)
  • WCode (Fri May 09 2003 - 05:01:12 EDT)
  • Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Thu May 08 2003 - 06:30:40 EDT)
  • Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp" (Wed May 07 2003 - 12:49:29 EDT)
  • UnicodeSchools.com? (Wed May 07 2003 - 08:48:26 EDT)
  • Viewing powerpoint for MacOSX (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:17:25 EDT)
  • Viewing powerpoint for MacOSX (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Tue May 06 2003 - 10:08:39 EDT)
  • Re: Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Mon May 05 2003 - 12:54:47 EDT)
  • Finite state machines? UTF8: toFold(), normalisation, etc (Mon May 05 2003 - 08:27:39 EDT)
  • Implementing on UTF8: toUpper(), toFold(), normalisation, collation, etc (Sat May 03 2003 - 11:50:13 EDT)
• Thomas Chan
  • Re: Decimal separator with more than one character? (Mon May 19 2003 - 09:53:16 EDT)
• Thomas M. Widmann
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:44:06 EDT)
  • Re: Dutch IJ, again (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:13:33 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 17:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Mon May 26 2003 - 07:01:39 EDT)
  • Re: IPA Null Consonant (Sun May 25 2003 - 11:02:18 EDT)
  • Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?) (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:21:06 EDT)
  • Dania in Unicode? (Thu May 15 2003 - 16:01:33 EDT)
• Tom Gewecke
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:50:48 EDT)
  • Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo) (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:05:46 EDT)
• Werner LEMBERG
  • Re: Characters as requested plus some more (Fri May 23 2003 - 01:53:22 EDT)
• William Overington
  • Re: Announcement: New Unicode Savvy Logo (Fri May 30 2003 - 04:20:51 EDT)
  • Re: "default ignorable" posts (was Re: Is it true that Unicode isinsufficientfor Oriental languages?) (Wed May 28 2003 - 03:00:51 EDT)
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient forOriental languages?) (Sun May 25 2003 - 05:22:19 EDT)
  • Re: "default ignorable" posts (was Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficientfor Oriental languages?) (Sun May 25 2003 - 05:22:07 EDT)
  • Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages? (Sat May 24 2003 - 06:53:32 EDT)
  • Re: Open public review items... (Thu May 22 2003 - 07:06:09 EDT)
  • The Quest text font now has chess sorts in it. (Tue May 20 2003 - 05:28:29 EDT)
  • Re: Klingon, again (Fri May 16 2003 - 06:29:07 EDT)
  • Re: 'code unit' and 'code point' meaning check (Fri May 16 2003 - 04:25:23 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Mon May 12 2003 - 07:05:21 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 11:02:28 EDT)
  • Re: Re: Quest text font now available. (Thu May 08 2003 - 06:55:53 EDT)
  • Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts (Thu May 08 2003 - 04:08:54 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Wed May 07 2003 - 04:19:12 EDT)
  • Re: Quest text font now available. (Wed May 07 2003 - 07:35:06 EDT)
  • Quest text font now available. (Tue May 06 2003 - 13:10:14 EDT)
  • Re: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Tue May 06 2003 - 04:08:05 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 17:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Mon May 05 2003 - 06:52:43 EDT)
  • Transcribing old documents into Unicode compatible document files. (Sat May 03 2003 - 08:12:32 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode in browser (Fri May 02 2003 - 03:57:07 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Fri May 02 2003 - 04:02:11 EDT)
  • Re: The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 14:29:08 EDT)
  • The text copying facility in Unicode code chart pdf files. (Thu May 01 2003 - 09:56:52 EDT)
• Winkler, Arnold F
  • RE: More of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 available online (Thu May 22 2003 - 06:42:44 EDT)
  • RE: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog (Tue May 06 2003 - 08:37:31 EDT)
• [email protected]
  • RE: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Wed May 14 2003 - 20:26:22 EDT)
  • Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii (Wed May 14 2003 - 19:08:31 EDT)
• Youtie Effaight
  • Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Orient (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:58:25 EDT)

Last message date: Sat May 31 2003 - 18:50:41 EDT
Archived on: Sat May 31 2003 - 19:29:21 EDT

891 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 31 2003 - 19:29:21 EDT