Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp"

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 09:07:21 EDT

  • Next message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""

    I suppose there is always Bytext?

    MichKa

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com>
    To: <kenw@sybase.com>; <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
    Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 5:08 AM
    Subject: RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a
    "compatibility decomp"

    > > That Cleanicode project is (or ought to be) distinct from
    > > the kind of project that Asmus has in mind of providing
    > > more precise, graduated, equivalence mappings that can
    > > be useful to implementations to actually produce the
    > > results that people expect, but which they may not get today
    > > just based on normalization forms.
    >
    > Another potential Gedankenexperiment would of course be a Cleanencoding,
    > but I guess the WCode is already quite good an attempt in that direction
    > (though I must admit that the WTF encoding makes me grimace a bit :-)
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 10:06:31 EDT